Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4182 of 2019 Applicant :- Imran Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Nasiruddin Warsi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Nasiruddin Warsi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the notice of intended marriage issued under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 on 9.5.2018 has been annexed as annexure no.3 to the affidavit filed in support bail application as well as High School Marksheet of victim which has been annexed at annexure no.2 to the affidavit showing the date of birth of victim as 25.9.1999. According to which, she is aged about 19 years. No medical was conducted. It is further submitted that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 3.7.2018.
Keeping in view the nature of submissions advanced, the applicant is entitled for bail.
Let, the applicant-Imran involved in Case Crime No.321 of 2018, under Section 363,366,376 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali, District-Maharajganj be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties (Rs. one lakh) (One should be of a family members) subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(II) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
The Trial court is directed to conclude the trial within six months.
Order Date :- 29.1.2019 aks