Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Imran @ Aadi vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|04 February, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant Imran @ Aadi with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 209 of 2020, under Section 8/20 of N.D.P.S. Act, police station Civil Lines, district Rampur during the pendency of trial.
Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that 580 gms. of charas is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant, which is below the commercial quantity, therefore provisions of Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not attracted in this case. In fact no such recovery was effected from the applicant. It is further submitted that since such recovery is not supported by independent witness, possibility of his false implication in the crime cannot be ruled out. It is also argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and victimize him. It is also contended that the the guidelines laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court with regard to arrest of any person by the police has not strictly been followed in the present case and the sampling of the alleged contraband substance has not been done in this case in accordance with standing order. The applicant is in jail since 17.7.2020. Criminal history of six cases of the applicant has properly been explained in the supplementary affidavit filed in support of the application. In case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage who is involved in supplying contraband, therefore, the applicant does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activity.
Having considered the submissions of the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits, let the applicant Imran @ Aadi involved in the aforesaid case, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
(v) The applicant shall file computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
(vi) The computer generated copy of this order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
(vii) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.
Order Date :- 4.2.2021 Sumaira
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Imran @ Aadi vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
04 February, 2021
Judges
  • Sanjay Kumar Singh