Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ikram vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35844 of 2016 Applicant :- Ikram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Dubey,Anand Kumar Mishra,Ashok Kumar Mishra,Rajesh Kumar Sharma,Santosh Prakash Pandey,Swati Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None has appeared on behalf of applicant to press this application. Learned A. G. A. is present.
2. It appears that by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous.
3. Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 29.1.2019
Manish Himwan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ikram vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 January, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Santosh Kumar Dubey Anand Kumar Mishra Ashok Kumar Mishra Rajesh Kumar Sharma Santosh Prakash Pandey Swati Agrawal

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.