Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ikram vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 May, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39822 of 2020 Applicant :- Ikram Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused Jabir has been granted bail by this Court vide Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 45939 of 2020. He further submits that since the role of the applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused, therefore, the applicant is also entitled for bail. Criminal cases shown as criminal history has been duly explained in the affidavit and all the cases were planted by the police after this case. The applicant is in jail since 03.07.2020.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the fact that the identically placed co-accused has already been released on bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that it is a fit case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Ikram involved in Case Crime No. 324 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 420, 467, 468, 471, 307 IPC, P.S. Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
The party shall file self attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned court/authority/official shall verify the authenticity of such computerised copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 12.5.2021 Sachdeva Digitally signed by Justice Om Prakash Date: 2021.05.12 13:52:57 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ikram vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 May, 2021
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui