Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32345 of 2018 Applicant :- Iklaas Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
According to the prosecution case the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown persons alleging that on 22.3.2018 some unknown persons has stolen a buffalo. One accused persons namely Sarfraj @ Oni was arrested by the police with mobile and golden ring. He disclosed the name other accused persons namely Sultan, Altaf, Tahir, Iklaas, Shane Alam.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that recovery is false and planted. Co-accused namely Altaf and Sarfaraj @ Aunni have already been granted bail by co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.5.2018 and 1.6.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30635 of 2018 and 20933 of 2018, since the role of the applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused, therefore, the applicant is also entitled for bail. There is no evidence to connect the applicant with the present matter. Offence under Section 411 IPC is not made out against the applicant. There is no independent witness against the applicant. Applicant was not named in the F.I.R. Nothing was recovered from the possession of applicant. The applicant is innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 19.6.2018 (near about two months) criminal history of six cases has been properly explained and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that criminal history has been explained.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let the applicant Iklaas involved in Case Crime No. 65 of 2018, under Sections 380, 411 IPC and Section 5/8 Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, P.S. Dilari, District Moradabad be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 24.8.2018 A. Singh