Hon'ble S.C. Agarwal,J.
It has been stated by the learned Addl. Government Advocate that the charge-sheet in this matter has been submitted against petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3 and 7 whereas against petitioner nos. 4, 5, 6 and 8, there is no evidence. Filing of the charge-sheet against petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3 and 7 would mean that the allegations in the FIR have been prima-facie corroborated by evidence collected during investigation. In such a situation, it would not be appropriate to enter into questions of fact and to quash the first information report. Moreover the petition has become infructuous in respect of petitioners no. 4, 5, 6 and 8.
Consequently, we dismiss this writ petition without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 2.2.2010 KU