Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 164 of 2006 Revisionist :- Smt. Husna Ara Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Shahabuddin Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,R.S.Shukla,Shailendra Sharma
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Re: Crl. Misc. Delay Condonation Application Under Section 5 of Limitation Act.
None has appeared on behalf of the applicant. Learned A.G.A. is present for State/Opposite Party.
Heard learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
There is delay of 1560 days in filing the present revision and none has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application moreover grounds shown in the affidavit are not sufficient to condone the delay caused in filing the revision.
Accordingly, the delay condonation application is rejected.
Order Date :- 28.7.2021 MN/-
.
.
.
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 164 of 2006 Revisionist :- Smt. Husna Ara Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Shahabuddin Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,R.S.Shukla,Shailendra Sharma
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Since delay condonation application has been rejected, consequently the revision is also dismissed.
Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 28.7.2021 MN/-