Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Hurjahan Begum vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20498 of 2018 Petitioner :- Hurjahan Begum Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 37 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mithilesh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer for a direction to second respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 31.1.2018/2.2.2018 (appended as Annexure No.12 to the writ petition) for demarcation of the plot in question within stipulated period.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and with the consent, the writ petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to second respondent to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned.
Order Date :- 30.5.2018 SP/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Hurjahan Begum vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2018
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Mithilesh Kumar Gupta