Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

H.Umalrasiyaa vs Executive Officer

Madras High Court|04 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner claiming to be the owner of land covered in S.No.93/1 and 93/2 which has been approved by the first respondent has given a representation to the first respondent to take action against the encroachers, namely respondents 2 and 3, as they have no legal right to encroach into the property. Since no action has been taken on the said representation, the petitioner has come forward with this writ petition, seeking a relief that appropriate action should be taken by the first respondent on the basis of the representation of the petitioner, dated 14.07.2016.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 has no objection in directing the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner on merits.
3. Therefore, without going into the merits of the matter, the first respondent is directed to consider the pending representation of the petitioner, dated 14.07.2016 in the light of the approved layout, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
04.01.2017 tsvn Internet : Yes / No To The Executive Officer Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Kuthalam - 609 801.
Nagapattinam District.
T.RAJA, J tsvn W.P.No.25444 of 2016 04-01-2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

H.Umalrasiyaa vs Executive Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 January, 2017