IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NOS.33906-33907 OF 2015 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
HUKMICHAND S/O LATE MOTHILAL AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS GOUTHAM STORES CHANNAGIRI MAIN ROAD OLD TOWN BHADRAVATHI – 577 301.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI.S.N.BHAT, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT.SUGANDA BAI W/O LATE PATEL DWARAKA GIRI AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS 2. VASANTHA BAI W/O RAVINDRA SINGH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT CHANNAGIRI MAIN ROAD OLD TOWN BHADRAVATHI – 577 301.
3. SMT.LEELA JAIN W/O LATE MOHAN LAL AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 4. GOUTHAMCHAND S/O LATE MOHAN LAL AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS PROP.GHOUTHAM PROVISION STORES CHANNAGIRI ROAD BHADRAVATHI BOTH ARE R/AT NARAYANA COMPOUND NEAR OLD POST OFFICE KOTE ROAD SHIVAMOGGA CITY.
...RESPONDENTS (CAUSE TITLE AMENDED V/O DATED 01.03.2016) (BY SRI.M.R.HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & 2 R-4 SERVED THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE ORDER PASSED BY II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AT BHADRAVATHI IN O.S.NO.186/2006 ON I.A. NO.14 DATED 22.1.2014 (ANNEX-F) AND ALSO ORDERS PASSED ON I.A.NO.18 DATED 9.7.2015 (ANNEX-J), CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE I.A.NO.14 AND ALLOW I.A.NO.18 ON THE FILE OF II ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AT BHADRAVATHI IN O.S.NO.186/2006 AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R 3rd defendant in O.S.No.186/2006 on the file of the II Additional Civil Judge & JMFC., Bhadravathi has come up in these Writ Petitions impugning the orders dated 22.01.2014 and 09.07.2015 passed on interlocutory applications.
2. When these matters are taken up for consideration this day, the stage of the original proceedings in O.S.No.186/2006 is looked into in the e-courts website of Shivamogga District. On going through the same, it is seen that O.S.No.186/2006 has already been disposed of on merits by judgment dated 02.01.2018. Therefore, nothing survives for consideration in these Writ Petitions as the same has become infructuous. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE Prs*