IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT APPEAL NO.2829 OF 2013 (KLR-LG) AND WRIT APPEAL Nos.4033-4035 OF 2013 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN:
HORTICULTURE DEPARTMENT GOVERMENT OF KARNATAKA, DIRECTORATE OF HORTICULTURE LALBAGH, BENGALURU – 560 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER WORKING AS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, SRI K.R. VIJAYAKUMAR S/O REVENASIDDAPPA.R., AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, HORTICULTURE DEPARTMENT, K.POOJENAHALLI HORTICULTURE FARM, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU. ...APPELLANT (By Sri BASAVARAJ KAREDDY, ADVOCATE FOR Sri SHIVASHANKAR.S.K., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA, R/O T.HOSAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
2. SRI MUNIYAPPAA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O NANJAPPA, R/O CHIKKASANNE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
3. SMT.VENKATAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O KRISHNAPPA, SINCE DEAD BY HER LR’s 3A. SMT.KAMALAMMA, } amendment carried out W/O NARASIMACHARI, } as per the order AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, } dated 21.08.2014 R/O NO. 619, 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS, CHAMARAJAPET, BENGALURU – 560 018.
4. SMT. PARVATAMMA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O MUNIYAPPA R/O CHIKKASANNE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001.
6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PODIUM BLOCK, VISHWESHWARAIAH TOWERS, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BENGALURU – 560 001.
7. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONR DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, VISHWESHWARA TOWERS, BENGALURU – 560 001.
8. THE TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS (By Sri S.VIJAYASHANKAR, Sr.COUNSEL FOR Sri H.N.M.PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 & LRs OF R3 & R4; Sri S.S.MAHENDRA, AGA FOR R5 TO R8) THESE WRIT APPEALS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NOs.43477-480/12 DATED 16/01/2013.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT In view of the memo dated 20.03.2019 filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the dismissal of the appeals, pending interlocutory applications are rejected.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE DH