IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO.45143/2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT. HONNAMMA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS W/O SESA MOOLYA RESIDENT OF PERIYODI BEEDU KALLIGE VILLAGE & POST BANTWAL TALUK – 574 231 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI NATARAJ BALLAL, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
SRI HOOVAYYA MOOLYA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS S/O LATE MADANA MOOLYA RESIDENT OF PUDIKELLAYA KODI HOUSE KALLIGE VILLAGE & POST BANTWAL TALUK – 574 231 ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI M.SUDHAKAR PAI, ADVOCATE FOR R1([a-e]) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 31.07.2013 PASSED BY THE SR. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, BANTWAL IN MA.NO.5/09, VIDE ANNAXURE-A.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is absent. Learned counsel appearing for the proposed legal representatives of the deceased respondent submits that the suit, out of which this writ petition has arisen, has been dismissed on 05.12.2016, and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accepting his submission, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. In view of disposal of the writ petition, no order is necessary on IA.Nos.1, 2 & 3 of 2016; they stand disposed of accordingly.
Petition disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE LB