IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.27994 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S HONEYWELL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT LTD NO D-103 ASHIRWAAD 1ST FLOOR KSSIDC INDUSTRIAL ESTATE RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 010 REPT BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI SUCHINDRA N DIXITH S/O LATE SRI N K S DIXITH AGE ABOUT 43 YEARS.
(BY MR. SARAVANA, ADV., FOR MR. D.R. RAVISHANKAR, ADV.,) AND:
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA RAJAJINAGAR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BRANCH RAJAJINAGAR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BENGALURU - 560 010 REPTD BY ITS MANAGER.
… PETITIONER … RESPONDENT (BY MR. T.S. MAHABALESWARA, ADV., FOR C/R) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD:27.6.2019 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G IN ACCORDANCE WITH RBI GUIDELINES AND CIRCULARS AS APPLICABLE TO MSME OTS SCHEME & ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Mr.Saravana for Mr.D.R.Ravishankar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.T.S.Mahabaleswara, learned counsel for caveator/respondent.
2. The writ petition is admitted for hearing.
With consent of the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a direction to the respondent to consider the representation date 27.06.2019 submitted by the petitioner 4. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the representation submitted by him shall be considered. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided in accordance with law by a speaking order within one week from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SS