Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Standing Counsel.
The writ petition filed by the applicant was disposed of with the direction to consider the claim of the applicant in the light of the judgment passed in Writ Petition No.872 of 1999, Rajendra Kumar Versus State of U.P. others. Pursuant to the same the opposite party has rejected the claim of the applicant on the ground that his claim on the basis of adoption deed could not be accepted as adoption deed was not registered nor applicant has been successful in proving the adoption.
According to the learned counsel for the applicant, the applicant had never set-up a claim on the basis of an adoption deed but was claiming as an heir being grand son of the deceased.
These questions cannot be decided in contempt application. The appropriate course open to the applicant is to assail the correctness of the order passed by the opposite party in appropriate proceedings in appropriate forum. As the directions of the writ court have since been complied with, notices are discharged. Application is consigned to record.
The record of the Writ Petition No. 40668 of 2007 be returned to its parent section.
Order Date :- 18.1.2012 SS