Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Hirdaya Mohan Sahai Sexena And Others vs K M L Pathak

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 2
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3130 of 2016 Applicant :- Hirdaya Mohan Sahai Sexena And 2 Others Opposite Party :- K.M.L. Pathak, V.C., U.P.P.D.D.U.P.C.V.V., Mathura & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhanshu Srivastava,Satyendra Nath Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Uday Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Learned Counsel for the applicant does not dispute that the order of the Writ Court has been complied. Applicant has been given pay scale of Research Assistant and thereafter granted Rs.9300 - 34800 Grade Pay.
The grievance of the applicant is that he not been granted time scale.
In my opinion, there is no such direction by the Writ Court nor was the issue of time scale before the Writ Court.
In these circumstances, the petition is consigned to record. Notice if any stands discharged.
The order has been passed after hearing Sri Uday Pratap Singh, learned Counsel for the opposite party.
Order Date :- 29.11.2018 I.A.Siddiqui
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Hirdaya Mohan Sahai Sexena And Others vs K M L Pathak

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2018
Judges
  • Suneet Kumar
Advocates
  • C V V Mathura
  • Sudhanshu Srivastava Satyendra Nath Srivastava
  • Sudhanshu Srivastava Satyendra Nath Srivastava