Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Himanshu vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|16 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 55910 of 2019 Applicant :- Himanshu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri I.P. Srivastava, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in light of the apprehension of the arrest of the applicant in Case Crime No. 0038 of 2019, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., police station Mahila Thana, District Saharanpur.
The Court finds no ground to accord the facility of anticipatory bail to the applicant who is the husband bearing in mind the nature of allegations which are made as also the fact that earlier also the dispute between the husband and wife had travelled to the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
The application fails and is consequently rejected.
Order Date :- 16.12.2019 faraz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Himanshu vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
16 December, 2019
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Ramesh Chandra Srivastava