Nellimarla Jute Mills Company Limited vs The State Of A P And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
20 September, 2014·It is stated that the petitioner-company owns vast extent of land admeasuring Ac.189-27 cents situated at Nellimarla village in Vizianagaram district which was initially acquired under a registered lease from the then ruler of Vizianagaram for the purpose of constructing houses for workmen and spinn...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt A Manju Vani And vs The Principal Secretary
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
20 September, 2014·ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for respondents. First and third petitioners are the wife and daughter of the second petitioner respectively. One A.V.Subhakar Reddy, who is the son of the first and second petitioners, died in a motor vehicle accide...
High Court Of Telangana
Transfer The Same To The File Of The Principal Senior Civil Judge’S Court
Judges: M Seetharama Murti Transfer
20 September, 2014·3. The husband/respondent while denying the material averments in the petition of the petitioner/wife had inter alia contended as follows: “The transfer petition is purposefully filed to procrastinate the matter. When this respondent is visiting Tanuku to attend the criminal cases filed by the wife,...
High Court Of Telangana
Krishnaiah vs M/S Guru
Judges: B Siva Sankara Rao
19 September, 2014·Crl. Rev.P.No.124 of 2013,dt.07.03.2013 2. (1970) 2 SCC 340 3. (2008) 151 DLT 695 4. AIR 1973 SC 157 5. AIR 1964 SC 1972 THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1437 of 2014 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C by the petitioner...
High Court Of Telangana
Ch Shankar Reddy vs $ Y Ram Reddy
Judges: C V Nagarjuna
19 September, 2014·NIL HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CRP.No.2884 of 2014 Date:19.09.2014 Between: Ch.Shankar Reddy, S/o Chilumula Chenna Reddy . Petitioner And: Y.Ram Reddy, S/o Muthi Reddy . Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Ravindra Bharati Counsel for the respondent: ---- The Court made the fol...
High Court Of Telangana
N Shiva Raj Madiga vs M Durga Reddy
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
19 September, 2014·N.Shiva Raj Madiga …Petitioner And M.Durga Reddy …Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.V.Ramakrishna Reddy Counsel for the respondent: --- The Court made the following: Order: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 18.03.2014, in IA.No.303 of 2014 in OS.No.2592 of 2008, on t...
High Court Of Telangana
K K Madhusudhan vs Y Subramanyam
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
19 September, 2014·ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order, dated 21.07.2014, in I.A.No.1392 of 2013 in OS.No.1761 of 2009 on the file of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District. I have heard Sri V.Vijaya Babu, learned counsel representing Sri K.B.Ramanna Dora, learned counsel...
High Court Of Telangana
Kambala Venkateswara Rao And 3 Others vs Vurukonda Chennama
Judges: R Kantha Rao Civil
19 September, 2014·THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.2612 & 2477 of 2014 COMMON ORDER: These two Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated 03.07.2014 passed in I.A.Nos.141 & 143 of 2014 in O.S.No.134 of 2009 on the file of ...
High Court Of Telangana
Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation vs S V S Bhavanaraynana And Another
Judges: Challa Kodanda Ram, L Narasimha Reddy
19 September, 2014·After the 1st respondent was transferred to the head quarters at Hyderabad, the unit head at Bhimavaram i.e., the 2nd respondent herein issued proceedings dated 23-03-1994 directing that the probation of the 1st respondent in the post of LDC would commence from 09-10-1986. Through another communica...
High Court Of Telangana
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Md Isaq @ Esamiya And Others
Judges: U Durga Prasad Rao
19 September, 2014·JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Award dated 21.10.2008 in OP No.470 of 20016 passed by the Chairman, M.A.C.T-cum-District Judge, Mahabubnagar (for short “the Tribunal”), the 2nd respondent in the OP/ New India Assurance Company Limited preferred the instant MACMA. 2a) On factual side, on 19.05.2005 whe...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.