M/S Sujana Capital Services Ltd vs M/S Fincity Investments Private Limited
Judges: L Narasimha Reddy Civil
26 November, 2014·M/s. Sujana Capital Services Ltd., Regd. Office at No.7, Vengalraonagar, Hyderabad, rep., by its Director Y.S.L. Prasad and two others ... PETITIONERS AND M/s. Fincity Investments Private Limited, a private limited company incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having R...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Sujana Capital Services Ltd vs Elem Investments Private Limited
Judges: L Narasimha Reddy Civil
26 November, 2014·M/s. Sujana Capital Services Ltd., Regd. Office at No.7, Vengalraonagar, Hyderabad, rep., by its Director Y.S.L. Prasad and two others ... PETITIONERS AND Elem Investments Private Limited, a private limited company incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having its Regd....
High Court Of Telangana
Mrs Shehnaz Alias Tayyba Rafeeq vs Sri Younus Khan
Judges: L Narasimha Reddy Civil
26 November, 2014·Between Mrs. Shehnaz alias Tayyba Rafeeq ... PETITIONER AND Sri Younus Khan .. RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3823 OF 2011 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the C.R.P has become infructuous. The C.R.P is accordingly dismissed. ...
High Court Of Telangana
Six Revisions
Judges: L Narasimha Reddy Civil
26 November, 2014·R.Ws.1 to 3 were examined on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3. However, they were not cross-examined on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter, his deposition was recorded. At that stage, the petitioner filed I.A.Nos.95,97 and 99 of 2014 with a prayer to recall each of the witnesses and I.A.Nos.96, 98...
High Court Of Telangana
Six Revisions
Judges: L Narasimha Reddy Civil
26 November, 2014·R.Ws.1 to 3 were examined on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3. However, they were not cross-examined on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter, his deposition was recorded. At that stage, the petitioner filed I.A.Nos.95,97 and 99 of 2014 with a prayer to recall each of the witnesses and I.A.Nos.96, 98...
High Court Of Telangana
Six Revisions
Judges: L Narasimha Reddy Civil
26 November, 2014·R.Ws.1 to 3 were examined on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3. However, they were not cross-examined on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter, his deposition was recorded. At that stage, the petitioner filed I.A.Nos.95,97 and 99 of 2014 with a prayer to recall each of the witnesses and I.A.Nos.96, 98...
High Court Of Telangana
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Kura Homes Private Limited “Rajendra Nilayam”
Judges: Sanjay Kumar I, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
26 November, 2014·The learned Tribunal while directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the issue on the question of requirement of production of completion certificate, following Delhi High Court judgment in the case [1] o f C.I.T. v. CHD Developers Limited observed that the aforesaid requirement is not for a ho...
High Court Of Telangana
Macma No 2879 Of vs M Lakshmidevi & Ors
Judges: B Chandra Kumar Macma
26 November, 2014·2. The New India Assurance Company Limited, represented by its Divisional Manager, Kurnool filed these civil miscellaneous appeals, challenging the awards and decrees dated 09/5/2005, 29/3/2006 in MVOP.No. 630 of 2005, MVOP.No. 629 of 2003 on the file of V-Additional District Judge [FTC] cum Motor ...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Durga Rice Mills vs The Eastern Power Distribution Company Of Ap Limited
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
26 November, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 28040 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The petitioner purchased a sick rice mill by name M/s. Vijay Modern Rice Mill belonging to a proprietary concern through a re...
High Court Of Telangana
Venkatswamy Died Per Lr vs Smt Ratan Bai And Two Others
Judges: L Narasimha Reddy Civil
26 November, 2014·Between Venkatswamy (died) per LR ... PETITIONER AND Smt. Ratan Bai and two others .. RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3754 OF 2014 ORDER: The C.R.P was argued at length on more than one occasion. Ultimately, learned counsel for the petitioner sought...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.