Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Sri Kanakadurga Dalitha Civil vs The Vice Chairman &M D Apsrtc
Judges: R Kantha Rao
23 July, 2014·The facts require to be considered in all these three writ petitions are identical and the issues involved for determination are also identical. Therefore, all the three writ petitions are disposed of by a common order. The brief facts necessary for considering the writ petitions may be stated as fo...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.