The Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: P Naveen Rao
08 July, 2014·.. Petitioner AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & 4 others .. Respondents The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.18855 of 2014 ORDER: In this writ petition, the on...
High Court Of Telangana
Ashwini Kumar Tyagi vs The State Through Sho Ps Bowenpally
Judges: K G Shankar
08 July, 2014·Date: 08.07.2014 Between: Ashwini Kumar Tyagi, s/o. A.R. Tyagi .. Petitioner/A.3 AND The State through SHO PS Bowenpally, Hyderabad, rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another .. Respondents HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl. Petiti...
High Court Of Telangana
Dr V Ravichandran vs The State Of A P
Judges: K G Shankar
08 July, 2014·Crl. Petition No.2468 of 2014 Date: 08.07.2014 Between: Dr. V. Ravichandran, and another. .. Petitioners/ Accused AND The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad, and another .. Respondents HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl...
High Court Of Telangana
Ms Sushma Putta vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: K G Shankar
08 July, 2014·Date: 08.07.2014 Between: Ms. Sushma Putta, w/o. Mohan .. Petitioner/A.4 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and another .. Respondents HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl. Petition No.35...
High Court Of Telangana
Rajesh Ramnani And 3 Others vs Lekhraj Ramnani
Judges: K G Shankar
08 July, 2014·It is contended by the 1st respondent that the petitioners thus committed fraud, forgery, cheating and misappropriation. 4. On the basis of the complaint, First Information Report (FIR) was issued. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the dispute is a pure civil dispute and th...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Venkateshwara Trading Co
Judges: K G Shankar
08 July, 2014·2. The 1st respondent laid five complaints against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the N.I.Act, for short). The cases were taken on file. The trial in each of the cases concluded. Ex.P-3 is the cheque, which stood dishonoured. After completion o...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Venkateshwara Trading Co
Judges: K G Shankar
08 July, 2014·2. The 1st respondent laid five complaints against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the N.I.Act, for short). The cases were taken on file. The trial in each of the cases concluded. Ex.P-3 is the cheque, which stood dishonoured. After completion o...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Venkateshwara Trading Co
Judges: K G Shankar
08 July, 2014·2. The 1st respondent laid five complaints against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the N.I.Act, for short). The cases were taken on file. The trial in each of the cases concluded. Ex.P-3 is the cheque, which stood dishonoured. After completion o...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Venkateshwara Trading Co
Judges: K G Shankar
08 July, 2014·2. The 1st respondent laid five complaints against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the N.I.Act, for short). The cases were taken on file. The trial in each of the cases concluded. Ex.P-3 is the cheque, which stood dishonoured. After completion o...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Venkateshwara Trading Co
Judges: K G Shankar
08 July, 2014·2. The 1st respondent laid five complaints against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the N.I.Act, for short). The cases were taken on file. The trial in each of the cases concluded. Ex.P-3 is the cheque, which stood dishonoured. After completion o...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.