Yandamuri Srinivas vs The State Of A P
Judges: Raja Elango
24 January, 2014·This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the appellant/accused challenging the Judgment, dated 13.09.2006, in Sessions Case No.132 of 2005 passed by the Court of Sessions Judge (Mahila Court), Vijayawada. The case of the prosecution is as follows: That the appellant/accused was working in a hotel run by...
High Court Of Telangana
Kongali Mopataiah vs The State Of A P
Judges: R Kantha Rao
24 January, 2014·. Respondent Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner / accused No.2 in Crime No.73/2013 of Jadcherla Police Station, Mahabubnagar District ...
High Court Of Telangana
B Laxmaiah And Others vs The Commissioner And Director Of Municipal Administration And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar
24 January, 2014·JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) This appeal has been preferred against the interim order dated 09.05.2013, whereby the learned single Judge allowed the respondents to proceed with the proposed auction and permitted the petitioners to participate therei...
High Court Of Telangana
M A Cm A vs Attuluri Siva Kumari @ Kumari And Four Others
Judges: Ashutosh Mohunta, M Satyanarayana Murthy M A
24 January, 2014·4. The details of deceased and injured persons, nature of injuries, their earnings, compensation claimed and awarded are shown hereunder in a tabular form for better appreciation and to avoid of repetition of facts. 5. On account of the injuries sustained by petitioner’s claimants’ in M.V.O.P. Nos.3...
High Court Of Telangana
M A Cm A vs Attuluri Siva Kumari @ Kumari And Four Others
Judges: Ashutosh Mohunta, M Satyanarayana Murthy M A
24 January, 2014·4. The details of deceased and injured persons, nature of injuries, their earnings, compensation claimed and awarded are shown hereunder in a tabular form for better appreciation and to avoid of repetition of facts. 5. On account of the injuries sustained by petitioner’s claimants’ in M.V.O.P. Nos.3...
High Court Of Telangana
M A Cm A vs Attuluri Siva Kumari @ Kumari And Four Others
Judges: Ashutosh Mohunta, M Satyanarayana Murthy M A
24 January, 2014·4. The details of deceased and injured persons, nature of injuries, their earnings, compensation claimed and awarded are shown hereunder in a tabular form for better appreciation and to avoid of repetition of facts. 5. On account of the injuries sustained by petitioner’s claimants’ in M.V.O.P. Nos.3...
High Court Of Telangana
Chatti Suresh Goud vs Ramavath Savithri Bai And Three Others
Judges: G Rohini
24 January, 2014·By judgment dated 2.9.2013 the lower appellate Court dismissed A.S.No.261/2012 preferred by the defendant and allowed A.S. No.38/2013 preferred by the plaintiffs. Hence this Second Appeal by the defendant. We have heard the learned counsel for both the parties. As could be seen from the material ava...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Bharathi Dave And Another vs The A P S
Judges: Ashutosh Mohunta, M Satyanarayana Murthy
24 January, 2014·During the course of enquiry, PWs 1 and 2 were examined and Exs.A-1 to A-23 were got marked on behalf of the claimants. On behalf of the respondent - APSRTC, neither oral nor documentary evidence was adduced. On a consideration of the evidence available on record, the Tribunal on issue No.1 held tha...
High Court Of Telangana
Charminar Co Operative Urban Bank Limited vs A Reddy And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar
24 January, 2014·A common order was passed by the said Appellate Authority on 20.04.2005. Therein, he referred to the fact that the preliminary objections raised by the Bank as to the maintainability of the appeals had already been decided by the earlier order dated 16.03.2004 and therefore did not need replication....
High Court Of Telangana
Machineni Kesava Rao vs Machineni Madhava Rao And Five Others
Judges: Ashutosh Mohunta
24 January, 2014·Defendant No.1 filed written statement admitting his relationship with the plaintiff but denied that the suit schedule property is their joint family property. It is his case that partition of joint family properties took place between himself, the plaintiff and defendant Nos.2 and 3 vide partition ...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.