M A Waheed vs Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
26 December, 2014·.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. M.Narsimloo Counsel for the respondents : Mr. S.V.Ramana (SC for TSSPDCL) The court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.5 in disconnecting AGL Service Connection No.82...
High Court Of Telangana
Ramvat Seviya Nayak vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
26 December, 2014·.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.I.Koti Reddy Counsel for the respondents: A.G.P. for Civil Supplies (AP) The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for quashing the show cause notice issued by respondent No.2 vide R.C.No.5706/2014-B, dated 08-11-2014. At the hear...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt T Nagarathnamma vs The Govt Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
26 December, 2014·Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside the proceeding bearing Rc.No.264/2014 (B), dated 15.12.2014, of respondent No.3. I have heard Mr.P.R.Balarami Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies (AP) representing th...
High Court Of Telangana
Sml Isuzu Limited vs The Transport Commissioner Road Transport Authority Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
26 December, 2014·SML ISUZU Limited Having its office at Plot No.301, Easteem House Door No.6-3, 456/20, Dwarakapuri Colony Punjagutta Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh India (Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Mr. Gopal Bansal) … Petitioner And The Transport Commissioner Road Transport Authority of Andhra Pradesh Dr. B.R. Ambe...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt S Annamma vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: B Siva Sankara Rao
24 December, 2014·Respondent COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: SRI. K. CHIDAMBARAM COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioners on bail in ...
High Court Of Telangana
Vadde Mallesh vs The State Of Telangana
Judges: B Siva Sankara Rao
24 December, 2014·Respondent/Complainant COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: Sri Gajanand Chakravarthi COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : The Public Prosecutor (TG) Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarg...
High Court Of Telangana
Kadapa District Marata Mandali vs K Radha Krishna Rao & Another
Judges: Raja Elango
24 December, 2014·This Criminal Appeal is filed by the complainant challenging the judgment dated 9.07.2007 on the file of II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa in C.C.No.245 of 2001 whereby the learned Magistrate found the first respondent- sole accused not guilty of the offence under Sections 418...
High Court Of Telangana
Dongre Khader Sab And Another vs Penumacha Satyanarayana Raju And Another
Judges: M Satyanarayana Murthy
24 December, 2014·9. The 2nd defendant also filed a separate written statement contending that she never signed on the agreement of sale and she is not a party to the agreement of sale. She is the Paradanashin lady and never signed on the document. But Mahaboob Basha who was sought to be made a party to the agreement...
High Court Of Telangana
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Sri Shankarlal
Judges: M Seetharama Murthy, L Narasimha Reddy
24 December, 2014·This batch of appeals presents certain typical questions, which do not occur frequently. The facts in brief are as under: The respondents in these appeals are assesseses under the Income Tax Act (for short ‘the Act’). A search was conducted under Section 132 of the Act on all the respondents on 16.0...
High Court Of Telangana
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Sri Shankarlal
Judges: M Seetharama Murthy, L Narasimha Reddy
24 December, 2014·This batch of appeals presents certain typical questions, which do not occur frequently. The facts in brief are as under: The respondents in these appeals are assesseses under the Income Tax Act (for short ‘the Act’). A search was conducted under Section 132 of the Act on all the respondents on 16.0...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.