Sriram Murthy And Others vs The State Of A P
Judges:
28 April, 2014·AND The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. Respondent/Respondent COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS : Sri T. Nagarjuna Reddy COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : The Additional Public Prosecutor Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stat...
High Court Of Telangana
C Md Yakub vs The State Of A P
Judges: B Siva Sankara Rao
28 April, 2014·C. Md. Yakub, S/o. Late Abdul Razak. . Petitioner/Accused AND The State of A.P., through S.H.O., III Town P.S., Kurnool, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad . Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated i...
High Court Of Telangana
Rangu Chennaiah Goud vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges:
28 April, 2014·And: The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. …Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.4862 OF 2014 ORDER: When this matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission ...
High Court Of Telangana
Bopana Venkata Rao And Others vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar Public Interest, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
28 April, 2014·Bopana Venkata Rao, Kovvur and others. And The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad and others. … Petitioners ….Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Public Interest Litigation No.122 of 2014...
High Court Of Telangana
Hope Tiger Regd Society vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar Public Interest, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
28 April, 2014·And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Hyderabad and others. … Petitioner ….Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Public Interest Litigation No.123 of 2014 Order: (per the Hon...
High Court Of Telangana
Sargadam Rama Krishna vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar Public Interest, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
28 April, 2014·Sargadam Rama Krishna, Amberupuram Village, Visakhapatnam District. And The Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam and others. … Petitioner ….Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Public...
High Court Of Telangana
C Sai Vishnuvardhan vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: Sanjay Kumar Public Interest, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
28 April, 2014·C. Sai Vishnuvardhan, Hyderabad. And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Backward Classes Welfare (C2) Department, Andhra Pradesh and another. … Petitioner ….Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ...
High Court Of Telangana
Sri Palla Durga Rao vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar Public Interest, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
28 April, 2014·Sri Palla Durga Rao, Visakhapatnam. And Union of India, Ministry of Defence, Indian Navy, Represented by its Flag Officer Commanding in Chief, Eastern Naval Command, Visakhapatnam and others. … Petitioner ….Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI...
High Court Of Telangana
Watch Voice Of The People vs The Chief Electoral Officer And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar Public, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
28 April, 2014·Watch Voice of the People … petitioner And The Chief Electoral Officer and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.95 of 2014 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupt...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Uppuluri Radhika vs Smt Vanga Surya Kumari And Three Others
Judges: Ashutosh Mohunta Civil
28 April, 2014·Sridhrudu (died) and others . On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents contended that since the application was filed by the petitioner after the commencement of trial, the trial Court rightly dismissed the same. Perused the record. Order VI Rule 17 reads thus: “Amendment of pleadings...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.