Karimtharuvi Tea Estates Ltd. And ... vs State Of Kerala And Ors.
Judges: O Prakash, J Koshy
20 October, 1998·Om Prakash, C.J. 1. This judgment will dispose of the appeal and the O.P., as both raise the same controversy.2. The appeal, preferred against the impugned judgment dated 18th March, 1993, raises a short but ticklish question for consideration whether Sub-rule (9) of Rule 21 of the Land Assignment R...
High Court Of Kerala
Ravi C.V. vs Cochin University Of Science And ...
Judges:
20 October, 1998·Both the petitioners have attained superannuation from the first respondent-University. It is pointed out that they have got unblemished service under the University. It is pointed out that the time bound Higher Grade scheme under the University allows appropriate grades to be sanctioned on completi...
High Court Of Kerala
Kunhimuhammed Haji vs Nambiarathu Pathummu
Judges:
20 October, 1998·1.The petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P12 order, dismissing the application filed by him for remitting the commission report, has approached this Court.2.The petitioner is the defendant in OS No.264/1998 on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Parappanangadi, for partition. This was originally dismissed. T...
High Court Of Kerala
Pala Marketing Co-Operative ... vs State Of Kerala And Anr.
Judges: P Shanmugam
20 October, 1998·P. Shanmugam, J. 1. The petitioner is a society registered under the Cooperative Societies Act. The writ petition challenges the proceedings initiated by the second respondent to reopen the assessment for the year 1989-90 invoking Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, hereinafter referred to as "the Ac...
High Court Of Kerala
Sanal Kumar vs The Kerala State Electricity ...
Judges:
17 October, 1998·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that, no instructions are received from the petitioners and the writ petition be closed.Recording the submission, the writ petition would stand closed.Sd/-K.Vinod Chandran Judge.vku/-[ true copy ]...
High Court Of Kerala
Against The Judgment In ... vs By Adv. Sri.P.F.Thomas (Sr.)
Judges:
17 October, 1998·~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.It is submitted that this matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.Sd/-(THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) Sd/-(B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/20/03 // True Copy // PA to Judge...
High Court Of Kerala
Against The Judgment In Os ... vs K.Kunjuleshmi
Judges:
17 October, 1998·Ramachandran Nair, J.Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission is granted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE P.V.ASHA, JUDGE sv....
High Court Of Kerala
Against The Judgment In Os ... vs By Advs.Sri.M.Venugopalan
Judges:
16 October, 1998·Chitambaresh, J.No representation for the appellant. Name called. Absent.The Appeal Suit is dismissed for non prosecution.Sd/-V.CHITAMBARESH,JUDGE Sd/-ANIL K.NARENDRAN,JUDGE nj/30.11.2016 //True Copy// P.S. to Judge....
High Court Of Kerala
Against The Judgment In Cc 61/1996 ... vs By Adv.Smt.Preethy Karunakaran
Judges:
16 October, 1998·The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the matter stands settled out of Court, and so the revision is not pressed. The submission is accepted. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed as not pressed in terms of the settlement.Sd/-...
High Court Of Kerala
A.K.Firoz vs The Deputy Transport ...
Judges:
16 October, 1998·The petitioner is the registered owner of a stage carriage vehicle bearing registration No.KL-8/K 1629 and is aggrieved by Ext.P2 order, passed by the 1st respondent, dismissing an appeal that was filed by the petitioner against an order demanding motor vehicle tax for the period from 01.07.1998 to ...
High Court Of Kerala
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.