Sri Nikhil Gowda @ Nikhil And Others vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: K N Phaneendra
24 October, 2019·... PETITIONERS ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI: ROHITH B,J., HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CRIME NO.154/2019 OF KAMAKSHIPALYA POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 353,342...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri B Manjunath vs The State Of Karnataka
Judges: K N Phaneendra
24 October, 2019·THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAJAGOPAL NAGAR POLICE STATION, IN CRIME NO.436/2019, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-01. (BY SRI: ROHITH B.J., HCGP) ... RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR...
High Court Of Karnataka
M J Boregowda vs State By Arakere Police
Judges: K N Phaneendra
24 October, 2019·(BY SRI: ROHITH B.J., HCGP) ... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CRIME NO.152/2019 REGISTERED BY ARAKERE POLICE STATION, MANDYA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 4(1)(1A), ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Pr Commissioner Of Income – Tax And Others vs M/S Kbd Sugar And Distilleries Ltd
Judges: Ravi Malimath, Ashok S Kinagi Income
24 October, 2019·... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. KBD SUGAR AND DISTILLERIES LTD., NO.17, SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 020. 1. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A.SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. M.LAVA, ADVOCATE) THIS APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Pr Commissioner Of Income – Tax And Others vs M/S Kbd Sugar And Distilleries Ltd
Judges: Ravi Malimath, Ashok S Kinagi Income
24 October, 2019·2. THE INCOME – TAX OFFICER, WARD – 4(2)(1), 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095. (BY SRI. K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. KBD SUGAR AND DISTILLERIES LTD., NO.17, SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 020. ... APPELLANTS ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A.SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL...
High Court Of Karnataka
G Sathish Kumar vs Mr Jayakumar Proprietor M/S Ganga
Judges: S G Pandit
24 October, 2019·MR. JAYAKUMAR PROPRIETOR M/S. GANGA FILTERS AND TRADERS H.NO.6-3-855, SADAT MANZIL LANE OPP. GREEN PARK HOTEL AMMERPET HYDERABAD-560 016. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI BALAKRISHNA M.R., ADV.) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28....
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Omkarappa And Others vs Excise Inspector Chikkamangaluru
Judges: K N Phaneendra
24 October, 2019·... PETITIONERS ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI: ROHITH B.J., HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.10/19 OF CHIKKAMAGALURU SUB DIVISION P.S. CHIKKAMAGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 13(1) (b) OF KARNATAKA EXCISE ACT AND SE...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Ravi Kumar Reddy Mudium vs State Of Karnataka Bagalur And Others
Judges: P B Bajanthri
24 October, 2019·2. Mrs.Jyothi Reddy Mudium w/o Ravikumar Reddy Mudium Aged about 30 years Presently r/a No.403 Krishna Plaza, 1st Main Vinayaka Nagar, IAF Yelahanka, Bangalore-560 063. ... Respondents (By Sri R D Renukaradhya, HCGP for R1, Sri V Vinod Reddy, Advocate for R2) This petition is filed under Section 4...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others vs M/S Citrix R& D India Pvt
Judges: Ravi Malimath, Ashok S Kinagi Income
24 October, 2019·2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE – 2(1) (1), 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095. (BY SRI. K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S.CITRIX R& D INDIA PVT., LTD., PRESTIGE DYNASTY, GROUND FLOOR, 33/2, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 049. 1. (BY MS.MANASA ANAN...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Branch Manager vs Mahadevamma And Others
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao Miscellaneous
24 October, 2019·THIS M.F.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T Though the matter is listed for orders, considering the nature and circumstances of the case, I.A. No.1/2019 is allowed. Delay of 39 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The matter is taken up for final ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.