K Murthy
Judges: Ravi Malimath, H P Sandesh
11 October, 2019·Point Nos.(i) and (ii): 12. The nut shell of the case of the prosecution is that the accused No.1 married the deceased and after six months, he left her and contracted second marriage. Hence, the deceased claimed maintenance on her behalf and also on behalf of her daughter and the Court has granted...
High Court Of Karnataka
Girijamma Wife Of Thimmappa Bandari vs Imthiyaz Son Of Sheik Hussain @ Kulla And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath, H P Sandesh
11 October, 2019·It is the case of prosecution that accused No.1 had eve-teased some girls at a fair and he was advised by deceased Manjunatha not to do so. At that time, C.Ws.20(P.W.12) to 22 had assaulted accused No.1 since he misbehaved. Accused No.1 had also not paid the hair cutting charges got done t...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Parashuram @ S M Parasappa vs Parasappa @ Parashurama S And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
11 October, 2019·…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SUKRUTA, ADV. FOR R2 R1, R3, R4, R6 –SERVED & UNREPRESENTED R5 – MINOR, REP. BY R3) THIS M.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.04.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.9/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, 6TH ADDI...
High Court Of Karnataka
State Of Karnataka vs Narasimha @ Narasimhamurthy And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath, H P Sandesh
11 October, 2019·3. The accused persons were secured and they did not plead guilty and claims the trial. 4. The prosecution, in order to prove its case has examined P.W.1 to P.W.23 and got marked the documents Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.18 and also marked M.O.1 to M.O.13. On behalf of the defense, they examined D.W.1 and D....
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Ashwath Kumar Rao vs Mr Ajith Kumar Shetty A And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
11 October, 2019·2. The claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claiming compensation for the injuries suffered in a Road Traffic Accident. It is stated that on 22.03.2010 when the claimant was proceeding in his Motor Cycle bearing Reg.No.KA-19/X- 8320 along with pi...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Mahesh vs The Divisional Manager The National Insurance Co Ltd And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
11 October, 2019·... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VENKATESH R BHAGAT, ADV. FOR R1 R2 – SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS M.F.A. FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 24.01.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.3981/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, MACT, BANGALORE, DISMISSING TH...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Amar & Co No 17 vs C Manchaiah Proprietor Of Mahalakshmi Drug
Judges: K N Phaneendra
11 October, 2019·C MANCHAIAH PROPRIETOR OF MAHALAKSHMI DRUG HOUSE, NO.924/1, 7TH CROSS, KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN, BANGALORE 560 060. ... RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED:9.1.2014, PASSED BY THE XVI ACMM,...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Srinivasaiah vs Smt Hemavathi W/O S Jayanna And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana, Sachin Shankar Magadum
11 October, 2019·BY ITS DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI RAVISHANKAR C R, ADVOCATE) AND 1. SRI. SRINIVASAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O SRI. DASEGOWDA, R/O NAGAVALLI VILLAGE, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK. 2. SMT. HEMAVATHI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, W/O SRI. S. JAYANNA, R/O 15TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN, S.I.T. EX...
High Court Of Karnataka
Ashok Kumar vs Sri Parameshwara B T
Judges: K N Phaneendra
11 October, 2019·“16. As noticed above, the entire purpose of requiring a notice is to give an opportunity to the drawer to pay the cheque amount within 15 days of service of notice and thereby free himself from the penal consequences of Section 138. In Vinod Shivappa (supra), this Court observed: “O...
High Court Of Karnataka
Girijamma Wife Of Thimmappa Bandari vs Imthiyaz Son Of Sheik Hussain @ Kulla And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath, H P Sandesh
11 October, 2019·It is the case of prosecution that accused No.1 had eve-teased some girls at a fair and he was advised by deceased Manjunatha not to do so. At that time, C.Ws.20(P.W.12) to 22 had assaulted accused No.1 since he misbehaved. Accused No.1 had also not paid the hair cutting charges got done t...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.