Sri A Mahaveer And Others vs Associates
Judges: Ravi Malimath, H P Sandesh
15 October, 2019·32. P.W.4, in his evidence, he says that the deceased is his sister and husband of the deceased was also a Pawnbroker. After the death of her husband, Chukibai was living alone in her house and she continued the Pawnbroker business of her husband and Chukibai continued to re- pledge the articles. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Srinivasa Murthy R vs Smt Ashwini W/O Late Ravi
Judges: Krishna S Dixit Miscellaneous
15 October, 2019·5 . UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., TP HUB, 6TH FLOOR, KRISHIBHAVAN BUILDING, HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU. …Respondents This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/s 173(1) of MV Act, against the Judgment and Award dated: 30.12.2017 passed in M.V.C. No. 5048/2015 on the file of the XXII A...
High Court Of Karnataka
Farooqia Teachers Training Institute And Others vs Smt Nikhat Kauser Daughter Of Mushtaq Ahmed And Others
Judges: Ashok S Kinagi, Ravi Malimath
15 October, 2019·...APPELLANTS (BY SRI L.M. CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. NIKHAT KAUSER DAUGHTER OF MUSHTAQ AHMED, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, LECTURER IN EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY, FAROOQIA, TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE, MAHADEVAPURA ROAD, UDAYAGIRI, MYSURU-570 019. 2. THE DIRECTOR FOR STATE EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND T...
High Court Of Karnataka
H V Ashok Kumar vs H V Prakash And Others
Judges: K Natarajan Regular
15 October, 2019·1. H.V. PRAKASH, S/O. LATE S.M. VEERABHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. 1949/55, 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS, S.S. LAYOUT, DAVANAGERE-577 001. 2. NIRANJAN, S/O. LATE S.M. VEERABHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1814/1, 3RD MAIN, 1ST CROSS, VINOBHA NAGAR, DAVANAGERE-577 001. 3. PARVATHI B. HATTIK...
High Court Of Karnataka
H V Ashok Kumar vs H V Prakash And Others
Judges: K Natarajan Regular
15 October, 2019·1. H.V. PRAKASH, S/O. LATE S.M. VEERABHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. 1949/55, 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS, S.S. LAYOUT, DAVANAGERE-577 001. 2. NIRANJAN, S/O. LATE S.M. VEERABHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1814/1, 3RD MAIN, 1ST CROSS, VINOBHA NAGAR, DAVANAGERE-577 001. 3. PARVATHI B. HATTIK...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Maruthi Engineering Works A Partnership vs The Bangalore Development Authority K P West Extension
Judges: Ashok S Kinagi, Ravi Malimath
15 October, 2019·“The learned counsel for the appellants submits that alternative site has been allotted to the respondent No.1 plaintiff. She has also produced copy of the order dated 3-7-2006 passed in CCC (Civil) No. 12/1996. In view of this, the claim of the plaintiff stands forfeited in terms of the decree...
High Court Of Karnataka
Shri Krishna vs State By Nanjangud Town Police Mysore
Judges: K Somashekar
15 October, 2019·No. 302/08 and order dated 28.02.2011 passed by the II-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysore in Crl.A.No.130/2010. This petition coming on for Hearing, this day, the Court made the following: O R D E R This criminal revision petition is directed against the judgment rendered by the App...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S H M T Watches Limited vs Sri Gangaiah
Judges: Ashok S Kinagi, Ravi Malimath
15 October, 2019·(BY SMT. BHARGAVI K.L., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI GANGAIAH SON OF VENKATARANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT "VENKATESHWARA NILAYA", 2ND ‘B’ CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR, TUMAKURU TOWN-572 102. ...APPELLANT …RESPONDENT (BY SRI M.S. BHAT, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HI...
High Court Of Karnataka
Adichunchanagiri Hospital And Research Centre vs Sri C Lingappa And Others
Judges: Ashok S Kinagi, Ravi Malimath
15 October, 2019·The petitioner being aggrieved by the award dated 26.10.2010 passed by the Labour Court, Mysuru in Reference No 253 of 2001, preferred Writ Petition No.41297 of 2011 before this court. This court allowed the writ petition in part and set aside the award of the Labour Court with regard to the ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Mutyalamma vs The Deputy Commissioner And Others
Judges: K Natarajan
15 October, 2019·(BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, HCGP FOR R1 & R2; ...PETITIONER … RESPONDENTS SRI VISHWANATH R. HEGDE, ADVOCATE for R3) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28.03.2012 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN R.A.SC/ST.14 of 2009-201...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.