Sri K K Dinesh vs The Deputy Commissioner Mandya District And Others
Judges: K Natarajan
17 October, 2019·4(A) SRI. B. G. RAVI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS S/O LATE B. N. GOVINDARAJU BASAVANAHALLY VILLAGE AKKIHEBBAL HOBLI K. R. PETE TALUK-571426 MANDYA DISTRICT. (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3 NOTICE TO R4 & R4(A) IS HELD SUFFICIENT) …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF TH...
High Court Of Karnataka
Reliance General Insurance Company Limited vs D Kavitha Now And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana, Sachin Shankar Magadum
17 October, 2019·...APPELLANTS (BY SRI.K.R.MURALI KRISHNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., NO.3, I FLOOR, NORTH WING, MAHANDI PLAZA, ST. MARK’S ROAD, BANGALORE – 560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. 2. MR. ANWAR BAIG, S/O PYAARY SAAB, NO.9/1, I MAIN, NEXT TO HUSNA MASJID, SRK GARDEN, JAYAN...
High Court Of Karnataka
S Swapna W/O Late And Others vs Vibor Agarwal Major And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana, Sachin Shankar Magadum
17 October, 2019·…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.A N KRISHNASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; V/O DTD.01.04.2014 NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:01.03.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.59/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE JUDGE, MACT AND XL...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Raja Rathnakara Shetty And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana, Sachin Shankar Magadum
17 October, 2019·THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, SATYANARAYANA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo stating that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. In the said memo it is also stated that amount in deposit may be transmitted to the Tribunal fo...
High Court Of Karnataka
Raja Rathnakara Shetty vs Ramesh Adiga And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana, Sachin Shankar Magadum
17 October, 2019·JUDGMENT The claimant in MVC.No.803/2008 on the file of MACT, Kundapur, has come up in this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation awarded for the injuries suffered in a road traffic accident dated 12.4.2008. 2. Admittedly, the claimant was inmate of Maruti Omni bearing r...
High Court Of Karnataka
Reliance General Insurance Company Limited vs D Kavitha Now And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana, Sachin Shankar Magadum
17 October, 2019·...APPELLANTS (BY SRI.K.R.MURALI KRISHNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., NO.3, I FLOOR, NORTH WING, MAHANDI PLAZA, ST. MARK’S ROAD, BANGALORE – 560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. 2. MR. ANWAR BAIG, S/O PYAARY SAAB, NO.9/1, I MAIN, NEXT TO HUSNA MASJID, SRK GARDEN, JAYAN...
High Court Of Karnataka
Hanumanthappa Giddanavar vs Rajkumar
Judges: S G Pandit Miscellaneous
17 October, 2019·2. The claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act claiming compensation for the injuries suffered by the claimant in a road traffic accident. It is stated that on 05.09.2009 when the claimant was walking near St. Mary School at Harihar, at that time, a NEKRTC bus bearing ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Raja Rathnakara Shetty And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana, Sachin Shankar Magadum
17 October, 2019·THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, SATYANARAYANA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo stating that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. In the said memo it is also stated that amount in deposit may be transmitted to the Tribunal fo...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri K N Shivananad vs United India Assurance Co Ltd And Others
Judges: G Narendar Miscellaneous
17 October, 2019·2. MAHANTESH N.K S/O PAPPANNA R/AT NO.1906, DEVANGA BEEDI, NELAMANGALA TOWN & TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562123. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI O MAHESH, ADV. FOR R1, R2 SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:23/11/2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.29...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Yashodamma And Others vs Sri Puttanarayana And Others
Judges: H P Sandesh
17 October, 2019·7. In pursuance of this suit, notice was issued against the defendants. The defendant Nos.2 and 3 have filed their written statement contending that the plaintiffs are not entitled for the relief of declaration and denied the averments made in the plaint. Without prejudice to their contenti...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.