The Manager Icici Lombard And Others vs T P Mohammed And Others
Judges: G Narendar M
31 October, 2019·1 (D) SAMSUDEEN S/O T.P. MOHAMMAD. 1 (E) T.M. JAFFAR S/O T.P. MOHAMMAD. ALL ARE R/AT. THITHIMATHI POST VINAYAKA NAGAR NOKY, VIRAJPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT-571218. AMENDED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 24-10-2019. 2. NEEFUN S/O LATE PEMMAIAH NOW AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT BALAJI VILLAGE MAYAMUDI POST KODAGU ...
High Court Of Karnataka
V Devraj
Judges: B A Patil
31 October, 2019·3. The factual matrix of the case as per the case of the complainant are that the complainant and accused were acquainted with each other and were good friends. Accused requested the complainant to advance a loan of Rs.2.70 lakhs (Rupees Two Lakhs Seventy Thousand Only) for his family and ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Shreyash vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: P B Bajanthri
31 October, 2019·This petition, coming on for orders, this day, the Court made the following: O R D E R It is seen that two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections on 11.04.2019. Thereafter, the matter was posted on 31.7.2019 and peremptorily two weeks’ time was granted to comply with the o...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Saroja D/O Late Thimmaiah vs Sri Sannaiah And Others
Judges: B M Shyam Prasad
31 October, 2019·SMT. SAROJA D/O LATE THIMMAIAH W/O SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT KOTHUR VILLAGE AND POST PONNAMPET, VIRAJPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. MAHESHKIRAN SHETTY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI. SANNAIAH S/O PUTTAIAH AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS RESIDING AT KAMPLAPURA V...
High Court Of Karnataka
Dr S Pruthviraja Pande vs The Vice Chancellar Rani Channamma University
Judges: S Sujatha
31 October, 2019·1 . THE VICE-CHANCELLAR RANI CHANNAMMA UNIVERSITY, N.H-04, VIDYA SANGAMA, BELAGAVI-591156. 2 . THE REGISTRAR (EVALUATIONS) RANI CHANNAMMA UNIVERSITY, N.H-04, VIDYA SANGAMA, BELAGAVI-591156. 3 . HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE & MANAGEMENT, RANI CHANNAMMA UNIVERSITY, N.H.-04, VIDYA S...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Jayalakshmi @ Jaya vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: P B Bajanthri
31 October, 2019·This petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following: O R D E R It is seen that on 16.01.2019 at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner two weeks’ time was granted to comply with the office objections. On 11.04.2019, again two weeks’ time was granted to comp...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ltu vs M/S Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd
Judges: Ashok S Kinagi, Ravi Malimath
31 October, 2019·M/S KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD., EXECUTIVE CHIEF ENGINEER (ELE) TL & SS DIVISION KPTCL DAVANGERE-577002. (BY SRI: SHARATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI: CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE) ... RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF OR...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ltu vs M/S Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd
Judges: Ashok S Kinagi, Ravi Malimath
31 October, 2019·M/S KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD., EXECUTIVE CHIEF ENGINEER (ELE) TL & SS DIVISION KPTCL DAVANGERE-577002. (BY SRI: SHARATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI: CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE) ... RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF OR...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ltu vs M/S Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd
Judges: Ashok S Kinagi, Ravi Malimath
31 October, 2019·M/S KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD., EXECUTIVE CHIEF ENGINEER (ELE) TL & SS DIVISION KPTCL DAVANGERE-577002. (BY SRI: SHARATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI: CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE) ... RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF OR...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ltu vs M/S Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd
Judges: Ashok S Kinagi, Ravi Malimath
31 October, 2019·M/S KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD., EXECUTIVE CHIEF ENGINEER (ELE) TL & SS DIVISION KPTCL DAVANGERE-577002. (BY SRI: SHARATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI: CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE) ... RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF OR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.