Smt Rathnamma vs Smt Manjula G
Judges: H B Prabhakara Sastry
22 October, 2019·This Regular First Appeal coming on for Orders, this day, the Court made the following: ORDER Called again. Learned counsel for the appellant absent. 2. In this appeal of the year 2016, till date, the appellant has not ensured the service of notice upon the sole respondent. 3. A perusal of the orde...
High Court Of Karnataka
Ramesha And Others vs T V Chandrashekar
Judges: P S Dinesh Kumar Miscellaneous
22 October, 2019·JUDGMENT Heard Shri P.Mahesha, learned advocate for the appellants, Shri P.Nataraju, learned advocate for respondent No.1 and Shri P.B.Raju, learned advocate for respondent No.2-Insurer. 2. This appeal is presented by the owner & driver of Goods Auto Rickshaw bearing No. KA-09-A-4810 cha...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri K S Krishna vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: G Narendar
22 October, 2019·1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HEBBAGODI POLICE STATION ATTIBELE CIRCLE, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 106. 2. SRI.SARANU BOWDDH.S S/O. H.M.SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT. BHUDDANAGARA HEBBAGODI LIMIT ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 106. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI....
High Court Of Karnataka
Mirza Humayun Ali vs P Sreedhar And Others
Judges: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
22 October, 2019·2. Azhar Syed Akbar, S/o Rawoof Syed Akbar, Aged 42 years, R/at No.5, Arab Lane, B-Street, Richmond Town, Bengaluru – 560025. (By Sri.Kiran, Advocate for R1 R2 - served) …Petitioner ...Respondents This Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash &/or set a...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Sadhana B S vs Sri Umesh Kumar
Judges: Suraj Govindaraj Miscellalneous, B V Nagarathna
22 October, 2019·7. The parties are present before this Court. They have been identified by their respective counsel. When queried by this Court, they have stated that they have indeed entered into a settlement, so as to resolve the dispute interse pending between them that they have arrived at a settlement on the...
High Court Of Karnataka
M S Ashok And Others vs Smt Bharathi @ Achala H K
Judges: B A Patil
22 October, 2019·4. SMT.PADMAJA, D/O M.S.SATHYANARAYANA, AGED 43 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEHOLD WORK, RESIDING AT RUKMALAYA, OLD SBM ROAD, CHIKMAGALUR – 577 101. (BY SRI.P.PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT.BHARATHI @ ACHALA H.K., W/O M.S.ASHOK KUMAR, AGED 37 YEARS, C/O ABISHEK H.K., NO.171/1, CHIRANJEEVI RESIDENCY, ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Pankaja Wagle And Others vs State Of Karnataka By Mahadevapura Police And Others
Judges: G Narendar Crl
22 October, 2019·2. It is submitted that the first petitioner and second respondent are married and certain matrimonial disputes arose on account of misunderstanding and reached the doors of the family court and it is submitted that the parties arrived at a mutually amicable settlement and on account of the settle...
High Court Of Karnataka
Shri Abdul Khayum A S
Judges: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
22 October, 2019·6. SMT. SHARTAZ BEGUM, W/O NAWAZ PASHA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT RAMAPURA, KOLLEGALA TALUK, CHAMARAJNAGAR DIST – 571 440. 7. SHRI. A.S.ABDUL MUNAF, S/O LATE ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.68, BHASKAR NAGAR, 1ST CROSS, ANJANAPURA POST, AVANAHALLI, BENGALURU SOUTH – 560 062. 8. SMT. JAMEE...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Teshee Venkatesh vs Sri K J Mithra
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
22 October, 2019·… PETITIONER (BY SRI. G R MOHAN, ADVOCATE) AND SRI K.J.MITHRA AGED 57 YEARS, S/O LATE JOGAPPA, BUS OPERATOR, 11TH CROSS, RAJENDRA NAGAR, SHIMOGA - 571 203. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. UMESH MOOLIMANI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S V PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIO...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.