Sunil A Manglani vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: G Narendar
23 October, 2019·(By Sri.Ashwin Chikkamath, Advocate) And: State of Karnataka, At the instance of M.S.Mahadev, The Senior Assistant, Director of Factories, Division – 7, Bengaluru – 560 029. (By Sri.Vijaya Kumar Majage, Addl. SPP) ...Petitioner …Respondent This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C....
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Vidya Kamal Kumari vs M/S Popular Finance Head Office Popular Towers And Others
Judges: H B Prabhakara Sastry
23 October, 2019·R-1, R3 and R4 - served) …Respondents **** This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the order and decree dated:22.11.2014 passed in O.S.No.3548/2013 on the file of the V Additional City Civil Judge (CCH-13) at Bangalore City, dismissing the su...
High Court Of Karnataka
State By Hunsur Town Police And Others
Judges: G Narendar
23 October, 2019·4. Malini, D/o. Sajjan Rao, Aged about 32 years, R/o Maruthi Badavane, Hunsur Town, Mysuru District – 571 105. 5. Shalini, D/o. Sajjan Rao, Aged about 35 years, R/o Maruthi Badavane, Hunsur Town, Mysuru District – 571 105. 6. Sathisha, S/o. Late Eshwaraiah, Aged about 42 years, R/o Kalikunke, Hun...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Ashok Gupta And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: G Narendar
23 October, 2019·3. Sri. Nitin Gupta, S/o M.P. Gupta, Aged about 44 years R/a. No.1002, Aspen (B) Godrej Apartments, Hebbal, Bengaluru-560 024 (By Sri.Chinmay J. Mirji, Advocate (Absent)) ...Petitioners And: 1. The State of Karnataka, Represented by Station House Officer, Peenya Police Station, Bengaluru city. 2...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Shivanna vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: G Narendar Crl
23 October, 2019·3. SRI AJITH SRINIVASAN S/O. LATE SRI. B.K.SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.157, RICHMOND ROAD, BENGALURU-560025. 4. SRI VINAY KARTHIK S/O SRI CHANDRAPRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, PARTNER OF D.K.SURESH INFOTECH COMPANY, OFFICE OF SUVI GRANITES EXPORT COMPANY, NEAR MUDDEMADAPPA MESS, GANDHIN...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Hindusthan Finance Corporation A vs The Bharath Telecom Fkcci Building And Others
Judges: H B Prabhakara Sastry
23 October, 2019·4. Whether the defendants prove that inspite of repeated request, plaintiff did not show any interest to execute the written Agreement in respect of small portion of the building on the 2nd floor towards Northern side measuring 10 feet x 10 feet as alleged in para No.2 of the written stateme...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri M Chandrappa And Others vs State By Chennarayapatana Ps Devanahalli Taluk And Others
Judges: John Michael Cunha
23 October, 2019·... PETITIONERS (BY SRI: P M SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. STATE BY CHENNARAYAPATANA PS DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE-1 2. N.SRINIVASA MURTHY S/O LATE PILLANARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT THELLOHALLI VI...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Shivanna vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: G Narendar Crl
23 October, 2019·3. SRI AJITH SRINIVASAN S/O. LATE SRI. B.K.SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.157, RICHMOND ROAD, BENGALURU-560025. 4. SRI VINAY KARTHIK S/O SRI CHANDRAPRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, PARTNER OF D.K.SURESH INFOTECH COMPANY, OFFICE OF SUVI GRANITES EXPORT COMPANY, NEAR MUDDEMADAPPA MESS, GANDHIN...
High Court Of Karnataka
N B Vrishabendrappa vs The State Of Karnataka By And Others
Judges: G Narendar
23 October, 2019·2. The petitioner is before this Court praying for quashing of charge sheet in C.C.No.252/2009 arising out of Crime No.17/2005 on the file of learned Principal Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Malur, for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 465, 468, 471...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt N V Priti vs Ekar
Judges: B V Nagarathna, Suraj Govindaraj
23 October, 2019·6. It is noted that it is signed by the respective parties and their counsel. It reads as under: “Under Order XXIII, Rule 3, read with Sec.151 of CPC, the PARTIES to the appeal beg to file the following compromise petition; 01. The Appellant has filed the above appeal against the Respondent for ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.