Sri S N Mahadeva
Judges: B A Patil
19 November, 2019·This Criminal Revision Petition coming on for Admission, this day, the Court made the following: ORDER This petition has been filed by the petitioner- accused Nos. 1 and 2, challenging the judgment passed by V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mandya, in Crl.A.No.01/2019 dated 27.04.2019. 2. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Shail Shankar Rao vs Ravindra
Judges: B A Patil
19 November, 2019·...Petitioner ...Respondent This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the judgment and order dated 06.08.2019 passed by the Court of the LVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge CCH-59 Bengaluru City in Crl.A.No.1407/2017...
High Court Of Karnataka
H S Ravi vs Chowdanayaka
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao
19 November, 2019·2 . D. SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O. LATE. DODDEGOWDA, R/AT HIREKYATHANAHALLY VILLAGE, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI RAGHAVENDRA M N, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND 1 . CHOWDANAYAKA S/O LATE. SIDDANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NILAVAGILU VILLAGE HUNSUR TALUK – 571 105 MYSORE DIS...
High Court Of Karnataka
The New India Assurance Co vs Kum Shaziya Banu
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao M
19 November, 2019·1. SRI. K NAGENDRA S/O KRISHNAPPA GOWDA PROPRIETOR OF S.U.R.M.S. PETE, MALAVALLI MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 430. 2. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD, REGIONAL OFFICE T.P. HUB, N/O 9/2 MAHALAKSHMI CHAMBERS, M.G.ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI C R RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The New India Assurance Co vs Kum Shaziya Banu
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao M
19 November, 2019·1. SRI. K NAGENDRA S/O KRISHNAPPA GOWDA PROPRIETOR OF S.U.R.M.S. PETE, MALAVALLI MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 430. 2. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD, REGIONAL OFFICE T.P. HUB, N/O 9/2 MAHALAKSHMI CHAMBERS, M.G.ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI C R RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri R R Keshavamurthy Foundation vs Ranna
Judges: S G Pandit
19 November, 2019·... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENT THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSES COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.10.2018 PASSED IN SC.NO.941/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDL.SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXXIII ACMM, BENGALURU [SC...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Jalaja vs Sree Sree Vidyaprasanna Thirtha Swamiji Samputa Peetadipathi
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
19 November, 2019·BETWEEN: 1. VANAJA V BHAT W/O. LATE. T V BHAT, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 2. MRS. AHALYA PARAMESHWARI, D/O. LATE. T V BHAT, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, 3. GHANASHYAMA, S/O. LATE. T V BHAT, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NEAR KUMARADHARA RIVER, SUBRAMANYA VILLAGE AND POST, SULLIA TALUK, DK. 574 239. (BY SRI. K...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Divyajyothi Vidya Kendra vs The Secretary Dept Of Industries & Commerce Government Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Pradeep Singh Yerur, Abhay S Oka
19 November, 2019·1. THE SECRETARY DEPT. OF INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE – 560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE M.S.M.E., KHANIJA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT V.V.TOWER BANGALORE – 560 001 4. TH...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Advay Enterprises A Proprietary vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Pradeep Singh Yerur, Abhay S Oka
19 November, 2019·THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 01.07.2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP.NOs.6627/2019 AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Heard the learned...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Prameela @ Prameela Kumari W/O vs The Assistant Executive Engineer Public
Judges: B Veerappa
19 November, 2019·O R D E R The petitioner filed the present writ petition for a writ of certiorari to quash the letter dated 28.1.2019 issued by the 1st respondent – Assistant Executive Engineer as per Annexure-F declaring the same as wholly without jurisdiction and illegal. 2. It is the case of the petitione...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.