Sri Nareppa And Others vs Sri Venkateshappa And Others
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao Regular
20 November, 2019·THIS RSA COMING FOR FURTHER HEARING ON THIS DAY THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed in R.A.No.65/2006 which came to be dismissed on 25.03.2008 thereby confirming the judgment and decree dated 06.01.2006 passed in O.S.No.192/2003 ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri B S Nagaraj vs Smt Vijayakumari D/O Venkatashetty
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao
20 November, 2019·SMT VIJAYAKUMARI D/O VENKATASHETTY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE/TYPIST, NO.11, 1ST FLOOR, DEPARTMENT OF KANNADA CULTURE AND LITERATURE, 2 VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE, R/A NO.2935,2ND A MAIN ROAD, BANASHANKARI II STAGE, BANGALORE-560070 ..RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRAMOD Y., ADVOCATE) THIS RFA I...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Rajesh Kumar vs Sri Prem Chand Agarwal And Others
Judges: K S Mudagal Miscellaneous
20 November, 2019·3 M THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T This appeal of the plaintiff arises out of the order dated 03.09.2011 in O.S.No.1091/2010 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-II, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore. 2. By the impug...
High Court Of Karnataka
National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Basavaraju And Others
Judges: B M Shyam Prasad Miscellaneous
20 November, 2019·3. SRI K.G.SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SON OF SRI K.G.RAMAPPA, RESIDENT OF KADADA KATTE VILLAGE, BHADRAVATI TALUK, SHIMOGA DIST. (OWNER OF LORRY NO.KA.35/278) ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI S.V.PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI R.GOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS MISCELLENEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U...
High Court Of Karnataka
Lalithamma Wife Of Palakshaiah And Others vs Smt Rathnamma
Judges: B M Shyam Prasad
20 November, 2019·... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHRIPAD V. SHASTRI., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. P.B. RAJU., ADVOCATE FOR R-2 ) THIS MISCELLENEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC. 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31.01.2011 PASSED IN MVC NO. 891/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM, TUMKUR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri G Nagaraja vs M N Venugopal And Others
Judges: B M Shyam Prasad
20 November, 2019·Judgment This appeal is filed by the appellant-claimant in MVC No.361/2004 on the file of the III Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) and MACT, itinerating sitting at Mulbagal (for short, ‘the Tribunal’). The appellant-claimant’s claim petition is partly allowed granting him a total ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Lalithamma Wife Of Palakshaiah And Others vs Smt Rathnamma
Judges: B M Shyam Prasad
20 November, 2019·... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHRIPAD V. SHASTRI., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. P.B. RAJU., ADVOCATE FOR R-2 ) THIS MISCELLENEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC. 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31.01.2011 PASSED IN MVC NO. 891/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM, TUMKUR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Kasturi W/O Thangaraju And Others
Judges: B M Shyam Prasad
20 November, 2019·1. SMT.KASTURI W/O.THANGARAJU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 2. JAYAPAL S/O.THANGARAJU AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS 3. JAYANTHI D/O.THANGARAJU AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS 4. ANNAMALAI S/O.MANICKYAM AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 5. CHANNAMMAL W/O.ANNAMMALAI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SINCE RESPONDENT NOS.2 & 3 ARE MINORS, REP. BY THEIR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Canara Bank A Body Constituted vs The Appellate Authority And Others
Judges: Ashok S Kinagi, Ravi Malimath
20 November, 2019·…..APPELLANT (BY SRI. D.L.N.RAO, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SMT. S.R. ANURADHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT 1972 REGIONAL LABOUR COMMISSION (CENTRAL) SHRAM SADAN, NO.9, 3RD MAIN, 3RD CROSS II PHASE, TUMKUR ROAD, YESHWANTPUR BENGALURU. 2. THE CONTROLLING AUTHORIT...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Nataraja vs Rajanna
Judges: K Natarajan Regular
20 November, 2019·2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the appellant as well as the respondent. 3. The status of the parties before the Trial Court is retained for the sake of convenience. 4. The case of the plaintiff in brief before the trial Court is that the plaintiff filed a suit for permanent inju...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.