Smt Girijamma vs Smt M A Bhagirathi And Others
Judges: Sreenivas Harish Kumar Miscellaneous
16 July, 2019·3. Smt. B.S.Shobharani, W/o. Late Vaidhyanatha, D-IN-Law of Gowramma, R/at No.349, 12th Cross, 2nd Block, Jayanagar, Bengaluru-11. Present residential Address No.213, 12th Cross, South End Circle, 2nd Block, Jayanagar, Bengaluru-11. 4. Smt. Sarojamma, W/o. Srinivasa, D/o. Gowramma, R/at No.Thall...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri M C Puttamasthi And Others vs Smt Lingamma W/O Late Borayya And Others
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao R
16 July, 2019·4. The substance of the suit filed by the plaintiffs are: Plaintiffs Chikkamasthaiah and Puttamasthi filed a suit in O.S.NO.202/1994 claiming absolute ownership over the suit schedule properties. They claim that schedule property was purchased by the father of the 1st plaintiff- Venk...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Step In Forum A Company vs M/S Step In Forum And Others
Judges: L Narayana Swamy
16 July, 2019·3. Earlier, the Appellant organisation had the Respondent No.2, Mr. Arunkumar Khannur, as one of its founding members. He was also the Managing Director of a Company known as Quality Solutions for Information Technology Pvt. Ltd. for short, `QSIT’. 4. However, in October 2005, the Respondent No.2 ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Legal Manager Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance vs Sadiq And Others
Judges: K Somashekar Mfa
16 July, 2019·JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the appellant – Insurer and the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 – claimant and perused the records. Respondent no.2 is served and remains unrepresented. 2. This appeal is preferred by the Insurance Company against the judgment and awa...
High Court Of Karnataka
Syndicate Bank A Bank Constituted vs Smt Meenakshi R Shetty Pinto Compound
Judges: L Narayana Swamy
16 July, 2019·2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent was working as a clerk at Kankanady Branch of the petitioner Bank from 5.8.1985till 20.6.1998, when she was relieved on transfer to the Regional Office, Belgaum. The petitioner bank served the respondent with a charge sheet dated 31.07.1998 alle...
High Court Of Karnataka
Visvesvaraya Iron & Steel Plant vs Employees State Insurance Corporation And Others
Judges: L Narayana Swamy
16 July, 2019·2. THE SECRETARY LABOUR, SHRAMSHAKTI BHAVAN NEW DELHI (AMENDED CAUSE TITLE VIDE ORDER DATED 03.12.2012) ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K.KRISHNAPPA, ADV. FOR R1; SRI.KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ASG FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH T...
High Court Of Karnataka
Bramhashree Narayana Guruswamy Billava Association vs The Land Tribunal And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
16 July, 2019·REP. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, BAPPALAGI VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D. K. DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI G.RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY, ADVOCATE FOR R2(a to e) AND R3(a to d), R4 & R5 ARE SERVED BUT REMAIN UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIO...
High Court Of Karnataka
Karnataka Industrial Co Operative Bank And Others vs Hospet Msa No 37/2013
Judges: K S Mudagal Miscellaneous
16 July, 2019·i) The dispute in question is not covered under Section 118 of the Act; ii) Defendant No.1 was required to show that the suit property was the subject matter of the award; iii) Despite giving sufficient opportunity, defendant Nos.2 to 4 and the sale officer failed to produce the records of execu...
High Court Of Karnataka
Hasan Modi Babu vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: John Michael Cunha
16 July, 2019·This Criminal petition coming on for Admission, this day, the Court made the following: O R D E R Petitioner is arraigned as accused No.1 in the charge sheet filed by the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 420 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard le...
High Court Of Karnataka
Karnataka Stage Agro Corporation Products Ltd vs Sri R Satish
Judges: H B Prabhakara Sastry
16 July, 2019·“1] Whether the plaintiff proves that defendant wantonly has withheld Rs.1,00,000/- without any reasons which is due to him on account of his retirement as alleged in the plaint? 2] Whether the defendant proves that it is not liable to pay any amount to the plaintiff as contended in t...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.