Mohammed Shafi vs Ayya
Judges: Mohammad Nawaz
22 July, 2019·3. A complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 read with 200 of Cr.P.C., (referred as to the ‘Act’ for short) was filed stating that in discharge of legally enforceable debt, the accused issued five cheques totally amounting to Rs.24,00,000/- and in the present case, when the...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Ruchi Goel W/O vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: John Michael Cunha
22 July, 2019·THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional SPP for respondent no.1. Counsel for respondent no.2 is absent. Perused the records. 2. Though the learned counsel...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mohammed Shafi vs Ayya
Judges: Mohammad Nawaz
22 July, 2019·3. A complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 read with 200 of Cr.P.C., (referred as to the ‘Act’ for short) was filed stating that in discharge of legally enforceable debt, the accused issued five cheques totally amounting to Rs.24,00,000/- and in the present case, when the...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Mohammed Zubair S/O Mosin Pasha
Judges: L Narayana Swamy, R Devdas
22 July, 2019·The second respondent issued a notification dated 09.03.2015 calling for applications to the post of Driver for which the petitioner and the fifth respondent submitted applications to claim their consideration under the respective groups. The requisite qualification for the said post wa...
High Court Of Karnataka
The State Of Karnataka
Judges: Mohammad Nawaz
22 July, 2019·THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2 JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal stating that the appellant has paid the fine amount as ordered by the trial Court. 2. The memo is placed...
High Court Of Karnataka
Venkataramu V vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri
Judges: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
22 July, 2019·ORDER The petitioner is seeking to be enlarged on bail in connection with his detention pursuant to the proceedings in Crime No.298/2018 with respect to the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the complaint was filed on 10.08.2018 by one...
High Court Of Karnataka
Anitha Sharma D/O M G M Sharma vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: P S Dinesh Kumar
22 July, 2019·... PETITIONER (REP BY LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001 2. SRIDHAR ALAMALLI S/O LATE ASHWATHNARAYAN SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.3030-B, 13TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560 008. (BY SMT.K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP) ... RESPONDENTS THIS CRL.PETITION IS FILED...
High Court Of Karnataka
Raju @ Jeevan And Others vs State Of Karnataka By Konankunte Police Station
Judges: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
22 July, 2019·2. Karthik @ Karthi @ Kanti S/o. Late Das Aged about 29 years, R/at Venayaka Koilu Street, Vepampattu, Thiruvallu, Tamil Nadu 600 024. 3. Ankaiah P S/o. Babu Aged about 19 years, R/at Ojipokkam Village, Kavetipura Post, Nagari Mandalam, Chitturu District, A.P.State – 517 001. … Petitioners (By S...
High Court Of Karnataka
Balaram T I vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
22 July, 2019·ORDER The petitioner is seeking to be enlarged on bail in connection with his detention pursuant to the proceedings in Crime No.208/2013 with respect to offences punishable under Sections 307, 504 r/w 34 of IPC. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the complainant’s brother-i...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.