M/S Singhi Buildtech Pvt Ltd vs Additional Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes Enforcement And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
31 January, 2019·3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, [ENF]-17 V.T.K.-2, BUILDING, B-BLOCK 3RD FLOOR, NEAR NGV, 80 Ft ROAD VIVEKNAGAR POST, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560047. …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI T.K.VEDAMURTHY, AGA.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IND...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Khalil Ahmed vs The Karnataka State Board Of And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
31 January, 2019·1. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE – 560 052 REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. GULISTAN SHADI MAHAL (WAQF) NO.129, INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001 REP. BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR. 3. SRI. NAZIR AHMED ENROLLMENT OFFICER & ELECTION OFFICER GULISTAN SHADI MAHAL (...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Pan Parag India Limited vs Joint Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes
Judges: S Sujatha
31 January, 2019·3. Learned Senior counsel Sri.Venaktaraman representing the learned counsel on record has argued that the impugned order suffers from legal flaws. The basis of remand order in not assigning reasons for rejecting the rectification application noticed by this court in terms of t...
High Court Of Karnataka
Devaraju C V vs Vijaya Bank And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
31 January, 2019·2. Vijaya Bank, Represented by its General Manager, Head office, M.G.Road, Bengaluru-560001. … Respondents This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash possession notice vide Annexure-A dated 12.04.2018 issued by the respondent No.1....
High Court Of Karnataka
Siri Finance & Investment Regd Brahmavar vs Sri H Ravindra Shetty
Judges: H B Prabhakara Sastry
31 January, 2019·(2) Whether the complainant further proves that the accused has committed the offence punishable u/s 138 of N.I.Act? 5. It answered point No.1 in the negative and observing that in view of answering point No.1 in the negative, point No.2 does not survive for consideration, acquitted the acc...
High Court Of Karnataka
C Sundaram vs Arama
Judges: B A Patil
31 January, 2019·The Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (ACCT) 10th Additional Circle, Seshadripuram, Bengaluru – 560 020. ... Respondent (Common in both the petitions) (By Sri.S.T.Naik, HCGP) These Criminal Revision Petitions are filed under Sections 397, 401 and 482 of Cr.P.C praying to ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Gowrisha And Others
Judges: K Natarajan
31 January, 2019·GOWRISH, S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT BIDARAGUPPE VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. (BY SRI S.B. TOTAD, BSPS ASSOCIATES) AND: STATE BY ATTIBELE POLICE. (BY SRI S.T. NAIK, H.C.G.P.) ... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER S...
High Court Of Karnataka
Lokraj And Others vs The State By Kargal Police
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao
31 January, 2019·5. The complaint was lodged by one Savitha, who is said to be the daughter-in-law of Aadappa on 9.6.2007 at about 9.00 a.m. It is stated that her father-in-law and others went to the court and she was along with her child and mother-in- law at Brahmana Ilakalale village. At abou...
High Court Of Karnataka
Wipro Infrastructure Engineering vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
31 January, 2019·THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- O R D E R The petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.12.2018 passed by the respondent No.2 under Section 9(2) of the CST Act, 1956 read with Section 36 of the KVAT Act, 2003 and the consequent...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.