Rudrappa And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
22 February, 2019·W.P.Nos.9662-9664/2018 BETWEEN 1. RUDRAPPA S/O ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/OF PALYADAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577527 2. SMT. ERAMMA W/O SHIVALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 3. SHIVALINGAPPA S/O KARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, PETITIONER NOS....
High Court Of Karnataka
Rudrappa And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
22 February, 2019·W.P.Nos.9662-9664/2018 BETWEEN 1. RUDRAPPA S/O ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/OF PALYADAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577527 2. SMT. ERAMMA W/O SHIVALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 3. SHIVALINGAPPA S/O KARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, PETITIONER NOS....
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt H R Kumarilakshmidevi W/O Shri vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
22 February, 2019·DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NO.7 T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI D.R. ANANDEESWAR, HCGP FOR R1; SRI HARISH KUMAR V.L., ADVOCATE FOR SRI ASHWIN C., ADVOCATE FOR R2) **** THIS WRIT PET...
High Court Of Karnataka
Union Of India vs Rajagopalshetty And Others
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
22 February, 2019·(By Sri N.S. Sanjay Gowda, Advocate) And: 1. Smt. Jayalakshmamma Wife of Late Nangegowda, Aged about 66 years. 2. K.M.Shivakumar Son of Late Nangegowda, Aged about 50 years. 3. K.M.Bharathi, Daughter of Late Nangegowda, Aged about 45 years. 4. K.M.Paramesh Son of late Nangegowda Aged about 4...
High Court Of Karnataka
Rudrappa And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
22 February, 2019·W.P.Nos.9662-9664/2018 BETWEEN 1. RUDRAPPA S/O ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/OF PALYADAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577527 2. SMT. ERAMMA W/O SHIVALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 3. SHIVALINGAPPA S/O KARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, PETITIONER NOS....
High Court Of Karnataka
And Out Advertising Private Limited And Others vs Award Appropriate Punishment To All The Accused
Judges: B M Shyam Prasad, Ravi Malimath
22 February, 2019·3. MR. SATEESH THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE K.R. PURA SUB-DIVISION BENGALURU - 560 036. ... ACCUSED (BY SRI:V.SREENIDHI, ADVOCATE FOR A-1 TO A-3; VIDE ORDER DATED 17.07.2018 A-4 TO A-6 ARE DELETED) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COU...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri A S Yogesh vs The Superintendent Of Police And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
22 February, 2019·3) THE POLICE INSPECTOR CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR THIRUMANI Y N HOSAKOTE PAWGODA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT – 561202. 4) THE POLICE SUB INSPECTOR Y N HOSAKOTE PAWGODA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT – 561202. RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 4 REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR … PETITIONER ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE HIGH ...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Spml Infra Limited vs Corporation Commissioner And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
22 February, 2019·3. The Executive Engineer, KUIDFC, NKUSIP Cell, Bellary City Corporation, Gudigi Chennappa Circle, Ballary-583 101, Karnataka. …Respondents (R1- served and unrepresented; v/o dated 18.07.2018, R2 & R3 are deleted) This C.M.P. is filed under Section 11(5) of the Arbitrati...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Spml Infra Limited vs The Municipal Commissioner And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
22 February, 2019·2. Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development Finance Corporation Limited, Represented by its Indira Nagar, 2nd Stage, Old Madras Road, Bengaluru-560 038, 3. The Executive Engineer, KUIDFC, NKUSIP Cell, City Municipal Council, Raichur Road, Sindhanur- 584 128, Karnataka. (Respondent served and ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Krishnamurthy J S vs The Bengaluru Development Authority And Others
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
22 February, 2019·Reptd., by its Commissioner. ... Respondent (By Sri. Keshav R Agnihotri, Advocate) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondent to consider the representation dated 16.10.2007 of the petitioner at Annexure-K. This Wr...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.