A M Roopa And Others vs A R Jagadish And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath, R Devdas Review
16 December, 2019·...PETITIONERS (BY SRI SAMPAT ANAND SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. A.R. JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS SON OF LATE RAMEGOWDA RESIDING AT "NAGAMMA NILAYA" 5TH CROSS, SHANKARPURAM HASSAN-573 201. 2. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS SON OF LATE RAMEGOWA RESIDING AT "NAGAMMA NILAYA" 5TH CROSS, SHANKARPURAM HASS...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sudarshan Reddy vs Thippeswamy G K
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao M
16 December, 2019·SRIDHAR S/O DALAVAI THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O BOMMAKKANAHALLI, CHITRADURGA TALUK, PIN 577501. ..APPELLANT (BY SRI B PRAMOD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THIPPESWAMY G K S/O G.K. KALLAPPA, OWNER OF MAHINDRA XYLO REG. NO.KA 35 M 8659, R/O KALLEDEVARAPURA VILLAGE JAGALURU TALUK, DAVANGER...
High Court Of Karnataka
Guddadamallayya vs Syed Anwar
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao
16 December, 2019·JUDGMENT Though the appeal is listed for admission, in the circumstances of the case it is taken up for final disposal. Appeal is directed against the Judgment and award dated 13.11.2018 passed in MVC No.1378/2016 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Chitradurga, wherein claim pet...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sudarshan Reddy vs Thippeswamy G K
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao M
16 December, 2019·SRIDHAR S/O DALAVAI THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O BOMMAKKANAHALLI, CHITRADURGA TALUK, PIN 577501. ..APPELLANT (BY SRI B PRAMOD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THIPPESWAMY G K S/O G.K. KALLAPPA, OWNER OF MAHINDRA XYLO REG. NO.KA 35 M 8659, R/O KALLEDEVARAPURA VILLAGE JAGALURU TALUK, DAVANGER...
High Court Of Karnataka
A Rajendra Kumar vs Smt Kamalamma W/O Late Nagaraj And Others
Judges: K S Mudagal Miscellaneous
16 December, 2019·JUDGMENT This appeal is filed challenging the order dated 09.04.2019 passed by the XII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru on I.A.Nos.4, 5 and 7 in O.S.No.1573/2017. 2. By the impugned order the trial Court has dismissed I.A.Nos.4 and 5 filed by the appellant for grant of injuncti...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri M Karunakar Reddy vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: K N Phaneendra
16 December, 2019·2. The respondent-Ramamurthy Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru, have registered a case in Crime No. 90/2018 for the offence punishable under Sections 403, 406, 420 of IPC, on the basis of complaint lodged by one Mr. Namakeerthy, which is now pending before the Court of 4th Addl. Chief Metropoli...
High Court Of Karnataka
Navya D/O Vanjakshi vs National Insurance Co Ltd No 144
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao
16 December, 2019·Appeal is directed against the Judgment and award dated 05.11.2018 passed in MVC No.3777/2017 by the XXI ACMM and XXIII ASCJ, MACT, Court of Small Causes, (SCCH-25) Bengaluru, wherein claim petition came to be allowed in part and compensation of Rs.1,19,926/- with interest at the rate of 8...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited And Others vs M/S Vijayaa Steels Limited A Company Incorporated And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath, R Devdas
16 December, 2019·2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELEC.) BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED O & M SUB-DIVISION KUNIGAL-572 126. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI SRIRANGA S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. VIJAYAA STEELS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OF...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Century Bangalore City Centre Pvt Ltd vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
16 December, 2019·2. State of Karnataka, Represented by its Secretary, …Petitioner Urban Development Department, 4th Floor, Vikasa Soudha, Ambedkar Veedhi, Bengaluru – 560 001. 3. The Commissioner, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike, NR Square, Hudson Circle, Bangalore – 560 002. 4. The Commissioner, Bangalore ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Vijay Lakshmi vs Sri S J Pavan Kumar And Others
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
16 December, 2019·THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Both the sides having argued the matter for some time, are agreeable with the suggestion of this court that the impugned order being a deemed decree under Order XXI Rule 103 of CPC, 1908, the challenge c...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.