Smt H R Savitha W/O T S Venkatesh Prasad vs Smt G S Lalithamma
Judges: Ashok S Kinagi
04 December, 2019·The appellant aggrieved by the said order has filed this appeal. 3. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties. 4. The contentions of the learned counsel for the appellant are that the appellant has obtained amount from his father i.e. PW-2 for advancing loan to the responde...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri L R Basavalingegowda And Others vs Sri S Sudhakar
Judges: H P Sandesh
04 December, 2019·8. It is further contended in the written statement that inspite of the defendants furnishing all the documents pertaining to the suit schedule properties, to enable the plaintiff to have the sale deed executed, the plaintiff has failed to do so. The defendants have contended that the plaintiff has...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Oriental Insurance Company Ltd vs Sri Nagesh Acharya And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
04 December, 2019·1. SRI NAGESH ACHARYA S/O GOPAL ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O HERADI, BRAHMAVARA, UDUPI TQ & DIST. 2. SRI THARANATHA, S/O NARASIHMA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT KADRIKATTU, MANOOR. 3. SRI.G. RAVEENDRA, S/O GOPAL POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O KOTATHATTU, UDUPI TQ & DIST. …RESPONDE...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Amarnarayan B V vs Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
04 December, 2019·3. On issuance of notice, the first respondent appeared and filed its statement whereas the second respondent remained absent and was placed ex-parte. The first respondent/insurer in its written statement denied the claim petition averments and also occurrence of the accident. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Sathish Chandran S vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
04 December, 2019·3. ABBASALI MULLA, S/O A N MULLA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, ASST. ENGINER GRADE-II KRIDL, OFFICE ASSIST DIRECTOR-I, BIJAPURA, JUBLE BHAVAN, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOTE. (BY SRI. M V RAMESH JOIS, AGA FOR R1; SRI. PAVAN KUMAR FOR … PETITIONER … RESPONDENTS SRI. H DEVENDRAPPA, ADVOCATES FOR R2; SIR. MANJUNATH PRAS...
High Court Of Karnataka
State By Banakal Police vs B R Vishwanath And Others
Judges: Sachin Shankar Magadum, S N Satyanarayana
04 December, 2019·JUDGMENT The complainant – State in SC.No.9/2013 on the file of the Court of the Principal Sessions Judge, Chikmagalur, has come up in this appeal impugning the judgment dated 14.3.2014 passed therein and also the order of acquittal passed in the said proceedings. 2. The brief facts leadin...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mahesh And Others vs Puttathayamma W/O Late Mahadevappa And Others
Judges: K Natarajan Regular
04 December, 2019·4. The case of the plaintiffs before the trial Court is that the plaintiff has filed a suit for partition and separate possession of 1/6th share in the suit schedule properties more fully described in the suit schedule contending that the suit schedule properties are the ancestral properties belon...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Puttathayamma vs Siddegowda
Judges: K Natarajan Regular
04 December, 2019·3. The status of the parties before the Trial Court is retained for the sake of convenience. 4. The case of the plaintiff is that he is the absolute owner of the suit schedule properties bearing Sy.Nos.359/2 and 360/3 measuring 83 and 82 guntas respectively, which are ancestral properties a...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri B P Naveen vs The State Of Karnataka
Judges: B A Patil
04 December, 2019·2. I have heard Sri P.Prasanna Kumar, learned Advocate appearing for Smt. Rashmi Jadhav, for petitioners and Sri.B.S.Prasad, Special Public Prosecutor for respondent-Lokayuktha. 3. The brief facts of the case are that, on the basis of a source report submitted by the Superintendent of P...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.