C Thippeswamy vs Harish Kumar B R And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
13 December, 2019·(BY SRI.R SHASHIDHAR, ADV. ) AND: 1. HARISH KUMAR B R S/O RAMAIAH AGE MAJOR OWNER OF MOTOR CYCLE BEARING NO.KA-17/EB-5031 R/O # 1906/29 SRI SIDDESHWARA NILAYA 5TH CROSS, VIDYANAGAR DAVANAGERE TOWN DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE P.B....
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Joagaiah
Judges: K Natarajan
13 December, 2019·3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MYSORE SUB-DIVISION, MYSORE - 570 001. 4. SRI CHELUVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O LATE HANUMA, 5. SRI VYRAMUDI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, ...PETITIONERS S/O LATE HANUMA, 6. PAPAIAH, S/O LATE HANUMA, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 6(a) AND 6(b), 6(a). SMT. RATH...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Susheelamma D/O Sri Late And Others vs The Deputy Commissioner Bangalore District And Others
Judges: P S Dinesh Kumar
13 December, 2019·SHRI. V. VIJAYASHEKHARA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R8; SHRI. G. PAPIREDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R9; VIDE ORDER DTD.2.9.2013, NOTICE TO R6 & R7 – HELD SUFFICIENT; R5(A) TO (G) -SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DAT...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri K Narayanaswamy vs Sri G M Nataraj
Judges: K N Phaneendra
13 December, 2019·5. The learned counsel contended that the trial Court has not even given any finding on the documents and not even referred to the Stamp Act or any other relevant provisions so as to come to the conclusion that the said document cannot be marked. 6. The learned counsel also contended that the re...
High Court Of Karnataka
State Of Karnataka vs H L Rama Murthy
Judges: K N Phaneendra
13 December, 2019·JUDGMENT This appeal is filed by the Lokayuktha Police against the judgment of acquittal dated 29.4.2015 passed by the XXIII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Bengaluru in Spl.C.C.No.53/2010. 2. Heard and perused the records. 3. Brief factual matrix of the case...
High Court Of Karnataka
N B Devaraju vs The Manager And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
13 December, 2019·JUDGMENT The claimant is in appeal, aggrieved by the dismissal of the claim petition under judgment and award dated 07-9-2011 in MVC No.6/2010 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Member-MACT at Arasikere. 2. The claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, cla...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Prashanth Rai J vs Nimesh Jain
Judges: S R Krishna Kumar Civil
13 December, 2019·…Petitioner (By Sri. Devi Prasad Shetty, Advocate) AND Nimesh Jain S/o not known to the petitioner, Aged in Major, # 157 Karthik Nagar, Marathalli, Bengaluru - 560037. (By. Sri. Parina Lalla, Advocate for N.D.S Law Partners) … Respondent This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 18 of the ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri R Jagannath And Others vs Ish Gowda
Judges:
13 December, 2019·THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, K.P.WEST BANGALORE – 560 020. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI.N.R.JAGADEESWARA, ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:15.12.2014 PASSED...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri K Narayanaswamy vs Sri G M Nataraj
Judges: K N Phaneendra
13 December, 2019·5. The learned counsel contended that the trial Court has not even given any finding on the documents and not even referred to the Stamp Act or any other relevant provisions so as to come to the conclusion that the said document cannot be marked. 6. The learned counsel also contended that the re...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.