Smt Naseema vs Sri K Narayan And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
23 August, 2019·2. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH: III, ESSEL CHAMBERS, III FLOOR, KARANGALPADY, MANGALORE TALUK, D.K. – 575 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.M. VENKATESH, ADV. FOR R-2; NOTICE TO R-1 IS DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED 28.02.2014) THIS M.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT A...
High Court Of Karnataka
E Papanna vs D H Venkatesha And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
23 August, 2019·R1-NOTICE DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 16.07.2015) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:4.9.2012 PASSED IN MVC NO.24/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. MACT VI, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEE...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Manoj Bawa vs Avesthagen Limited
Judges: P B Bajanthri
23 August, 2019·(By Sri. Mohumed Sadiqh, Advocate for M/s. K.V. Legal Advocates) AND : Avesthagen Limited Having its registered office at “Discoverer” 9th Floor, Unit 3, ITPL, Whitefield Road, Bengaluru-560 066. Represented by its Managing Director Dr. Villo Morovala Patel. (By Sri. E. Kiran Kumar Advocate; Sri. Na...
High Court Of Karnataka
B V Bharadwaj vs Smt R Archana And Others
Judges: Sreenivas Harish Kumar
23 August, 2019·(By Sri. R.Manjunath, Advocate) …Respondents This RPFC is filed under Section 19(4) of Family Courts Act against the judgment dated 19.08.2011 passed in Crl.M.C.No.618/2007 on the file of the Additional Judge, VI Additional Family Court, Bengaluru, partly allowing the peti...
High Court Of Karnataka
Swarnalatha Vasanth vs Dinesh Suvarna And Others
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
23 August, 2019·SWARNALATHA VASANTH, D/O LATE DEVARAJ SUVARNA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT ‘BESHA’, 606, RMV EXTENSION, II STAGE, III BLOCK, OPP RMV CLUB, 80 FEET DOUBLE ROAD, DOLLARS COLONY, BENGALURU-560 093. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DINESH SUVARNA, S/O LATE K....
High Court Of Karnataka
H G Sathish vs B C Nijalingappa And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
23 August, 2019·JUDGMENT The claimant is before this Court in this appeal not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded under Judgment and Award dated 13.12.2012 in M.V.C.No.62/2012 on the file of Additional M.A.C.T at Sagar. 2. The claimant filed claim petition under Section 166 of the Mo...
High Court Of Karnataka
N Rajkumar And Others vs Sri B Gangadharachar
Judges: B M Shyam Prasad
23 August, 2019·Next > IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1883 OF 2015 (MON) Next >...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Umesha vs State Of Karnataka By Balehonnur Police
Judges: G Narendar, H P Sandesh
23 August, 2019·7. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for State would contend that the prosecution witnesses have supported the case of the prosecution. The witnesses have spoken that on the previous night, the accused and the deceased were together and further contended that the weapon used for commit...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.