Shyamlal Devda And Others vs Parimala W/O Manoj Kumar And Others
Judges: John Michael Cunha
02 April, 2019·THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 14 in Crime No.46/2015 registered in Halasurgate police station for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 504, 323 r/w Section 34 of Indian Pena...
High Court Of Karnataka
Venkatesha @ Paapu vs The State Of Karnataka Through Bilichodu Police Station
Judges: H B Prabhakara Sastry, K N Phaneendra
02 April, 2019·10. In the wake of the above said submissions made by both the counsels, now we would like to examine the evidence on record, to ascertain whether the prosecution has proved the case beyond reasonable doubt that the accused has actually committed the murder of the deceased or not. As rightl...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Pearson India Education Services Private Limited vs A V Public Senior Secondary School Abohar
Judges: Alok Aradhe Civil
02 April, 2019·THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Sri B.N.Prakash, learned counsel for petitioner. Sri Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of the learned cou...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Church Of South India Trust Association vs Welfare Officer And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
02 April, 2019·1. WELFARE OFFICER, … PETITIONER WOMEN & CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT MS BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE PRESIDENT, CHILDREN’S WELFARE SOCIETY, D.K. DISTRICT, BONDEL, KRISHNANAGAR, MANGALURU 575 008. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI Y.D.HARSHA, AGA FOR R.1, R.2 SERVED) 2 THIS WR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Lakshmi S @ Sakamma vs The New India Assurance Co Ltd And Others
Judges: Sri M N Umashankar, B Veerappa
02 April, 2019·2. K. Nagendra, Major, M/s Sri. Udayaranga Motor Service Pete Beedi, Malavalli Town, Mandya Dist. - 571 401. ... Respondents (By Sri. A.M. Venkatesh, Advocate for R.1) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16.09.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.5306/2014 ON THE FIL...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Managing Director vs Smt Venkatamma
Judges: Mohammad Nawaz Miscellaneous
02 April, 2019·BETWEEN THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BANGALORE CENTRAL OFFICES, KSRTC DEPOT, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027. NOW BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NWKRTC., CENTRAL OFFICES, GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI-580030. REPRESENTED BY IT’S CHIEF LAW OFFICER. ... APPELLANT [BY SRI. F.S.DABALI, ADVOCATE] AND 1....
High Court Of Karnataka
Majlis –E Muntazima vs The Karnataka Board Of Wakfs And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
02 April, 2019·3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SHIVAJINAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU – 560 051. 4. ASADULLA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O ABDULLA, R/A NO.27, SLAUGHTER HOUSE ROAD, ‘B’ STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 051. 5. SYED AKRAM, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O SYED ASLAM, R/A NO.27, SLAUGHTER HOUSE ROAD, ‘B’ ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Shri A Ravi And Others vs State By Jayaprakash Nagar Police Station And Others
Judges: John Michael Cunha
02 April, 2019·5. SMT. A. ROOPA W/O A. NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT 143, OPP. TO GANESH TEMPLE, SARAKKI MAIN ROAD, 1ST PHASE, JP NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 078. 6. SHRI. K. UDAY KUMAR S/O LATE KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.6, YELLAMMA BUILDING, NEAR ROSE GARDEN, KOTHNUR DINNE MAIN ROAD, S.O.S. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Managing Director vs Smt Venkatamma
Judges: Mohammad Nawaz Miscellaneous
02 April, 2019·BETWEEN THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BANGALORE CENTRAL OFFICES, KSRTC DEPOT, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027. NOW BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NWKRTC., CENTRAL OFFICES, GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI-580030. REPRESENTED BY IT’S CHIEF LAW OFFICER. ... APPELLANT [BY SRI. F.S.DABALI, ADVOCATE] AND 1....
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr K M Prabhu vs M/S Burma Shell Oil Storage And Distribution Company Of India Limited A Company Incorporated And Others
Judges: K S Mudagal
02 April, 2019·10. The trial Court after hearing the parties dismissed the suit on the following grounds. i) Plaintiff did not produce the title deeds relied upon by him; ii) Revenue records produced and relied upon by the plaintiff are not the documents of title and they do not confer any title on the plaint...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.