Rajalakshmi G R And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
12 April, 2019·2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, CHITRADURGA-577501. 3. THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR VANIVILASA CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR FACTORY, HIRIYUR-572144. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI Y.D. HARSHA, AGA) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mayanna Gowda
Judges: B Veerappa Review, S N Satyanarayana
12 April, 2019·578. MANJUNATHA K D KELAGALALE KOPPAL MALLIPATTANA POST, ARAKALGUD TQ HASSAN DISTRICT - 57102. 579. AMARNATH T HNO. 49, ANOOP NIVAS 2ND CROSS, 13TH MAIN, K.G.HALLI HALALHALLI, WEST BANGALORE - 560 015. 580. KUMUDA GIRISH 1617, K BLOCK, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR MYSORE - 570 023. 581. MADHSHUDHAN K P S/O PAL...
High Court Of Karnataka
Association For Democratic Reforms vs Election Commission Through Its Chief Electoral And Others
Judges: L Narayana Swamy, P S Dinesh Kumar
12 April, 2019·b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to the Respondent No.1 to enforce the norms and modalities in respect of publication of information and opinion about the contesting candidates that it has already laid down; c) Pass such further orders as the Hon’ble Court may deem ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Hiveloop Logistics Pvt Ltd vs State Of Karnataka Department Of Co Operation And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
12 April, 2019·1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001, ... PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING NO.16/11, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE ADDITIONAL...
High Court Of Karnataka
Ambari Recreation Association vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
12 April, 2019·4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UPPARPETE, BENGALURU-560 009. (BY MR. VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA) … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS POLICE NOT TO COMPEL OR PRESSURIZE THE PETITIONER TO CLOSE DOWN THE RE...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Hiveloop Logistics Pvt Ltd vs State Of Karnataka Department Of Co Operation And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
12 April, 2019·1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001, ... PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING NO.16/11, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE ADDITIONAL...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Syed Ummer And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
12 April, 2019·1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR BEEDI BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE MEDICAL EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR BEEDI BENGALURU – 560 001. 3. THE HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE GOVERNMENT O...
High Court Of Karnataka
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Lakshmamma W/O Annaiah @ Nanjappa And Others
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao Miscellaneous
11 April, 2019·3. In order to avoid over-lapping and confusion, the parties are referred as Insurance Company and Claimants. 4. The facts leading to initiating proceeding before the Tribunal is that, on 05.03.2007, at about 9-30 to 10-30 p.m, at Hiriyur Taluk, Hosur Village inside U.E.M.S.R.J.V. Plant, which i...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Vasanthi Belchadthi And Others vs Smt Venkamma Poojarthi And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
11 April, 2019·1(A)(vi) SRI HARISHA, S/O LATE SUNDARI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. ALL ARE R/AT DOOR NO.3-409, NEJIGURI, JARA, MOODUSHEDDE GRAMA, MANGALURU TALUK. 1[B] SRI. KORAGAPPA KARKERA S/O. LATE VENKAMMA POOJARTHI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 1[C] SMT LAXMI D/O LATE VENKAMMA POOJARTHI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 1[D] SMT PADMINI...
High Court Of Karnataka
K P Hemaraj vs Veerendra Kumar And Others
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao Miscellaneous
11 April, 2019·3. Upon presentation of claim petition by the appellant/petitioner, second respondent-Insurance Company contested the same by denying all the averments made in the petition. The learned Member has disposed of the matter by allowing the petition in part and an amount of Rs.1,27,393/- was...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.