M/S Anand Mining Industries Mandihal vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: L Narayana Swamy, P S Dinesh Kumar
15 April, 2019·ORDER Petitioner was running a stone crusher unit in Survey No.120 measuring 3 acres of Mandihal Village, Dharwad Taluk and District, after obtaining licence in the year 1985. Petitioner filed an application for renewal of licence and the same was rejected. Petitioner challenged the rejection order ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Shashikala D/O Late vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: P S Dinesh Kumar, H G Ramesh
15 April, 2019·1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PUTTUR AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY PUTTUR TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574 201 3. SRI GOVINDA GOWDA S/O LATE VENKATAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT PARLADAKA NEAR MAJJ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Sudhakantha
Judges: Mohammad Nawaz Miscellaneous
15 April, 2019·2. Smt. Basamma, W/o. M.S.Helawar, Aged about 71 years, R/at Lakshmisha Nagar, Kadur Town. ... Appellants (By Sri. H.R. Anantha Krishna Murthy, Advocate) And: 1. Smt. Indramma, W/o. Late Kubera Gowda @ Kuberappa, Aged about 38 years 2. Kum. K.K.Manjula, D/o. Late Kubera Gowda ...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Kmc Stone Crusher A Partnership vs Deputy Director Department Of Mines And Geology Near Ijuru Police Station North Extension And Others
Judges: L Narayana Swamy, P S Dinesh Kumar
15 April, 2019·THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The petitioner was granted with a quarrying lease to extract ordinary building stone. After expiry of lease, petitioner submitted an application for renewal of the lease on 08.02.2012 and the same was rejec...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Shivaramaiah vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
15 April, 2019·THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R This writ petition is filed seeking direction to the second respondent – Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore District, to effect phodi of the petition schedule land i.e., land measuring to ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri B Gopal And Others vs Ini Layout
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
15 April, 2019·2. Mrs. Asha Parveen W/o Not known to the petitioner, Major in Age, No.20, 7th Cross, JC Nagara, Nandini Layout, Bengaluru – 560 096. 3. Sombamma D/o late Munithimmaiah, W/o late Ramaiah, Aged about 66 years 4. Jayalakshmamma D/o late Ramaiah, Aged about 46 years 5. Rajappa S/o late Ramaiah, Age...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri M Prabhu vs The Management Of M/S Skf Bearings India Ltd
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
15 April, 2019·THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. SKF BEARINGS INDIA LTD., PLOT NO.2, BOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL AREA HOSUR ROAD, BENGALURU-562158, REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER (HRD) ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Dyavappa And Others vs Munishamappa And Others
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
15 April, 2019·2. CHINNAKRISHNAPPA D/O DYAVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT SRIRAMAPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 064. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI ABHINAY Y.T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MUNISHAMAPPA S/O LATE DODAPPAYA, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, RESIDING AT SRIRAMAPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, B...
High Court Of Karnataka
Karnataka Power Corporation Limited vs Alike
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
15 April, 2019·Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Bengaluru Zonal Office 3rd Floor, B Block BMTC, Shantinagar – TTMC K H Road, Shantinagar Bengaluru – 560 027. ... Appellant … Respondent (By Sri Pradeep Singh, Advocate for Respondent) This Writ ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri H K Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
15 April, 2019·2. The petitioner, who was working as First Division Assistant (for short ‘the FDA’) in the 2nd respondent - Mandya Urban Development Authority (for short ‘the MUDA’) approached this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the findings of Enquiry Repo...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.