The Management Of M/S Festo Controls Private Limited vs Smt Iylene And Others
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
16 April, 2019·1. SMT. IYLENE WIFE OF LATE LOUIS MANOHARAN AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, NO.66, 2ND CROSS, PAMMAGOWDA ROAD, GEETHA MANDIR STREET, J.C. NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 006. 2. KUM. BONICE JOANA DAUGHTER OF LATE LOUIS MANOHARAN, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN RESPONDENT NO.1 SMT. IYLENE, NO.6...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Rajashekaraiah vs The Hon’Ble Chief Justice High And Others
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
16 April, 2019·COMMON JUDGMENT Aggrieved by the impugned order dated 09.10.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. Nos.2258 and 2259 of 2011, by which the petitions were dismissed, the writ petitioners are in appeal. 2. Since both the writ appeals arise out of a common order passed in the above writ peti...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Rajashekaraiah vs The Hon’Ble Chief Justice High And Others
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
16 April, 2019·COMMON JUDGMENT Aggrieved by the impugned order dated 09.10.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. Nos.2258 and 2259 of 2011, by which the petitions were dismissed, the writ petitioners are in appeal. 2. Since both the writ appeals arise out of a common order passed in the above writ peti...
High Court Of Karnataka
N Lakshman vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
16 April, 2019·2. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER VSO-183, CHICKBALLAPUR-562 101. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIKRAM HUILGOL, HCGP) THESE WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 READ WITH RULE 27 OF THE WRIT PROCEEDINGS RULES, 1977 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt B S Lakshmi vs The Commissioner Bengaluru Development Authority And Others
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
16 April, 2019·2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BENGALURU-560 001. ... RESPONDENTS THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 01/10/2012 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.20800/2012 [BDA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Breton India Services Private Limited A Company Incorporated vs Akumar
Judges: Alok Aradhe Civil
16 April, 2019·O R D E R Sri.C.K.Nandakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. None for the respondent. 2. The petition is admitted for hearing and the same is heard finally. 3. By means of this petition under Sections 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referr...
High Court Of Karnataka
Muttappa Basappa Savadi
Judges: B A Patil
16 April, 2019·Muttappa Basappa Savadi Aged about 35 years, R/at Siddapura Village, Yamalapura Post, Raybagh Taluk, Belagavi District-531 316. …Petitioner (By Sri H. Jagadeesha and Smt. Rashmi K.R., Advocates-Absent) AND: The State of Karnataka by Upparpet Police Station, Bengaluru, Rept. by Public Pr...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Devendrappa H And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Aravind Kumar
16 April, 2019·(BY SRI. LEELADHAR H.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY AMRUTHAHALLI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY REP: SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. SMT. SANJITHA BASAVANAL D/O N.U. SHIVA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/A NO.445/15/1 ... PETITIONERS 2ND FLOOR, BHUVANAGIRI NEAR BACKSIDE OF BRU...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Amar B Khandre vs Karnataka State Industrial Investment & Development Corporation Ltd And Others
Judges: Ashok G Nijagannavar Civil
16 April, 2019·2. SRI BHIMANNA S/O SHIVALINGAPPA KHANDRE, R/O GUNJ BHALKI, TALUK BHALKI, BIDAR DISTRICT, & AT NO 101 KRISHNA APARTMENTS, ALI ASKER ROAD, BENGALURU - 560052 3. SRI CHANNABASAPPA HALHALLI S/O SHIVARUDRAPPA HALHALLI, ADVOCATE & PRESIDENT, KARNATAKA RASTRIYA EDN. SOCIETY, BIDAR, R/AT H NO 1-3-107, VI...
High Court Of Karnataka
A Shraddha Prabhu D/O Sri A And Others vs Canara Bank And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
16 April, 2019·O R D E R Sri. Prasanna V. R., learned counsel for the petitioners. Sri. Haridass Bhat V, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2. 2. These writ petitions are admitted for hearing. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally. 3. In these petitions, petitioners have assailed the ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.