Vasu vs State By Kengeri Police Station Kengeri
Judges: B A Patil
22 April, 2019·This Criminal Petition coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:- O R D E R This petition has been filed by the petitioner/ accused No.7 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. to release him on bail in Crime No.431/2018 of Kengeri Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences puni...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh S/O Narayanappa
Judges: B A Patil
22 April, 2019·THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 22.04.2019 to withdraw the petition as not pressed. 2. The said memo is placed on record and the petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- JUDGE Sb...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Fayaz Ahmed @ Muhammad Fayaz vs Sri Shanmugam
Judges: Sreenivas Harish Kumar Regular
22 April, 2019·Sri. Fayaz Ahmed @ Muhammad Fayaz Ahmed Proprietor M/s. Crescent Realtors, No.38/2, 1st Floor, Meanee Avenue, Assaye Road, Bengaluru-560042. (By Ms. Bharati Patil, Advocate) AND Sri. Shanmugam, Aged about 53 years, S/o. Sri. Rajamanickam Residing at No.38/12, …Appellant Meanee Avenue, Assaye Road, B...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri S Raman vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: Aravind Kumar
22 April, 2019·STATE OF KARNATAKA INSPECTOR OF POLICE ATTIBELE POLICE STATION BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001. (BY SRI. S. RACHAIAH, HCGP) ... RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER D...
High Court Of Karnataka
Abdul Hafeez vs The Administrator The Karnataka State And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
22 April, 2019·2. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAQF NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE-560 026 REP. BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 3. THE WAQF OFFICER DISTRICT WAQF OFFICE BENGALURU URBAN (SOUTH) HAMEED SHAH COMPLEX BANGALORE-560 001. 4. THE WAQF OFFICER DISTRICT WAQF ADVISORY COMMITTEE HAMEED SHAH COMPLEX BANGLO...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Vivek R vs Smt Thejaswini S N
Judges: Ashok G Nijagannavar
22 April, 2019·SMT.THEJASWINI S.N, D/O V.NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/AT SOMENAHALLI VILLAGE AND HOBLI, GUDIBANDE TALUK, CHIKKA BALLAPUR DISTRICT-562105. ...RESPONDENT **** THIS R.P.F.C. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT 1984 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 11.10.2018 PA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Shri P Krishnamurthy Rao
Judges: S Sujatha
22 April, 2019·2. Shri H. Nanda Kishore S/o H. Chandrashekar, Aged 38 years, R/at No.4, Near Kalyan Co-operative Housing Society Layout, Sonnenahalli, (Bhuvaneshwari Nagar II Stage) Jnanbharathi Post, Bengaluru – 560 056. …Petitioners (By Sri. Kiran Kumar, Advocate) AND: The Bangalore Development Autho...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Berger Paints India Limited vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: Ravi Malimath, S G Pandit Civil
22 April, 2019·(BY SRI ATUL K. ALUR, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, KARNATAKA, VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA, KALIDAS ROAD, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 009. ... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENT THESE CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 15-A OF THE KARNA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr A R Abhishek Proprietor vs M/S Karnataka State Pollution Control Board
Judges: L Narayana Swamy, P S Dinesh Kumar
22 April, 2019·2. Smt. Annu Bhardwaj, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that it is recorded in the impugned order that the stone crusher unit was not functional since April 2018 and that being so, there could not be any pollution at all. It is submitted that in view of certain complaints which a...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.