Sri Hanumantharayappa And Others vs Sri K V Venkatasubbaiah And Others
Judges: B A Patil Regular
11 October, 2017·S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS 4. SRI. MARUTHI S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS 5. SMT SARASWATHI D/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS 1 TO 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF HUNASAWADI VILLAGE PURAVARA HOBLI. MADHUGIRI TALUK – 572 132 TUMKUR DISTRICT. 6. SRI. NAGARAJ S/O ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others vs M/S Infosys Bpo Ltd Plot
Judges: H G Ramesh, P S Dinesh Kumar
11 October, 2017·M/S INFOSYS BPO LTD. PLOT NO.26/D, 26/4 & 26/6 KONNAPPA AGRAHARA, ELECTRONIC CITY HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 100 ...RESPONDENT (BY Ms.TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR FOR SRI T.SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATES) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBST...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Jayalakshmi W/O Late M And Others vs The Bangalore Development Authority T Chowdaiah And Others
Judges: B S Patil
11 October, 2017·6. SRI.MOHANLAL P JAIN SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR SMT.TULSIBAI, W/O LATE MOHANLAL P JAIN, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O NO.26, SHANKESHWAR, 2ND CROSS, SHANKAR MUTT ROAD, CHIKKANNA GARDEN, BANGALORE. ... PETITIONERS (By Sri D.R.RAVISHANKAR, ADV.) AND 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHO...
High Court Of Karnataka
C Hemachandra And Others vs The Commissioner & Others
Judges: Vineet Kothari
11 October, 2017·THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Mr. Ambaji Rao Najarae, Adv. for Petitioner Mr. N. R. Jagadeeshwara, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. 1. The petitioner- Mr. C. Hemachandra filed this petition in this Court on 25.08.2016 with...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Abdul Wahab vs Smt Padmamma W/O Late T Venkatesh And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana Regular
11 October, 2017·IN RFA NO.406/2007: BETWEEN: Sri. Abdul Wahab, S/o A. Khuddus, Aged about 60 years, R/at No.242, 19th Cross, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru – 560 032. ... Appellant (By Smt. Budrunnisa, Advocate) AND: 1. Bangalore Development Authority, T.Chowdaiah Road, Kumara Park West, Bengaluru – 560 020. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
D S Dwarakanath And Others vs Chief Officer
Judges: Vineet Kothari
11 October, 2017·3. D.S.Madhu Rao S/o Late D.R.Srinivasa Murthy Aged about 49 years Residing at Venugopalaswamy Road Chowka Devanahalli Town Bangalore Rural District 562110. 4. The Assistant Engineer Town Municipal Council Devanahalli Bangalore Rural District 562110. 5. Revenue Inspector Town Municipal Council...
High Court Of Karnataka
Nursi Salian W/O Kalappa C Salian vs The Managing Director Hanuman Transport Company Pvt Ltd And Others
Judges: B A Patil Miscellaneous
11 October, 2017·3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the appeal are: While Smt.Nursi Salian was walking on the left side of the road on N.H.17 on 01-01-2009 at about 1.00 p.m., a bus bearing Registration No.KA-20/A-2857 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner dashed against the claimant, as a...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Abdul Wahab vs Smt Padmamma W/O Late T Venkatesh And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana Regular
11 October, 2017·IN RFA NO.406/2007: BETWEEN: Sri. Abdul Wahab, S/o A. Khuddus, Aged about 60 years, R/at No.242, 19th Cross, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru – 560 032. ... Appellant (By Smt. Budrunnisa, Advocate) AND: 1. Bangalore Development Authority, T.Chowdaiah Road, Kumara Park West, Bengaluru – 560 020. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The New India Assurance Company Ltd vs Smt Bindu Madhavi W/O Late And Others
Judges: B A Patil
11 October, 2017·2. Heard. Appeal is admitted. With consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is taken up for final disposal. 3. The brief facts leading to the case are that on 22.1.2007 at about 8.15 p.m. when Srinivasalu was walking by the side of the road on the footpath on Hunsur road near...
High Court Of Karnataka
Chikkanna Shetty vs The State Of Karnataka Badanavalu Police Station
Judges: Rathnakala, K S Mudagal
11 October, 2017·4. Sri.Gangadhar Sangolli, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submits, the allegation of the prosecution was, the accused was demanding money to meet his expenses and it was never the case of the prosecution that he was demanding money as dowry. All the kith and kin of the decease...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.