Sri Rajesh Nayak And Others vs The State By
Judges: K S Mudagal
17 October, 2017·(ii) once the prescribed period is over there cannot be any deemed extension on remand of the accused to the judicial custody. In support of his contention, he relies upon the following Judgment; (iii) when the report / application for extension of time under S.22(2) was filed beyond prescribed peri...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mahesh @ vs The State Of Karnataka Through Chamarajnagar
Judges: Rathnakala
17 October, 2017·Next > IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17th DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 BEFORE Next >...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Sri Vyshnavi Builders And Others vs Reserve Bank Of India 10/3/8 And Others
Judges: A S Bopanna
17 October, 2017·Next > IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA W.P.Nos.9605/2017 & 11745-11748/2017 (GM-RES) C/W. C.M.P. NO.275/2017 Next >...
High Court Of Karnataka
Ashwathanarayana Setty And Others vs The Government Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: A S Bopanna
17 October, 2017·Next > IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.BOPANNA Next >...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Virupakshappa And Others vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: K S Mudagal
17 October, 2017·3. SRI PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O SHEKAPPA HADIMANI R/OF, SHAKUNAVALLI VILLAGE SORABA TALUKA SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 419. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI PRABHUGOUD B.TUMBIGI, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ANAVATTI POLICE REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001. …RES...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Ayush Yadav vs State By Sheshadripuram Ps
Judges: Rathnakala
17 October, 2017·O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State. 2. The petitioner is in judicial custody in Cr.No.76/2017 registered by the respondent-police. During the pendency of the petition,...
High Court Of Karnataka
A Sadananda Shetty And Others vs The State Of Karnataka & Others
Judges: Vineet Kothari
17 October, 2017·4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT, MANGALORE. 5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT, MANGALORE. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A. M. SURESH REDDY, AGA. FOR R-1 & R-3 TO R-5.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION O...
High Court Of Karnataka
Teja Shree Shetty W/O Sudakar Shetty And Others vs The State Of Karnataka & Others
Judges: Vineet Kothari
17 October, 2017·4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT, MANGALORE. 5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT, MANGALORE. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A. M. SURESH REDDY, AGA. FOR R-1 & R-3 TO R-5.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION O...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.