M/S Sri Vigneshwara Granite vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, P S Dinesh Kumar
27 July, 2017·Mr.V.G.Bhanuprakash, learned additional government advocate, accepts notice for all the respondents. Therefore, formal service of notice of the writ petition to the respondents is dispensed with. 2. Mr.Prakash B.S., learned advocate appearing for the writ petitioner, has limited his prayer in the...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Jyothi Granites vs The State Of Karnataka The Secretary Department Of Industries And Others
Judges: Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, P S Dinesh Kumar
27 July, 2017·2. Mr.V.G.Bhanuprakash, learned additional government advocate, accepts notice for all the respondents. 3. The writ petitioner is aggrieved, as the application dated November 19, 2014, for grant of quarrying lease was not considered by the authorities, on the presumption that the revenue and the for...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Jyothi Granites vs The State Of Karnataka The Secretary Department Of Industries And Others
Judges: Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, P S Dinesh Kumar
27 July, 2017·2. Mr.V.G.Bhanuprakash, learned additional government advocate, accepts notice for all the respondents. 3. The writ petitioner is aggrieved, as the application dated December 18, 2014, for grant of quarrying lease was not considered by the authorities, on the presumption that the revenue and the for...
High Court Of Karnataka
Pooja D/O Irayya Subhapurmath vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, P S Dinesh Kumar
27 July, 2017·2. This is a writ petition, in substance, seeking for a direction to the authorities to execute the lease in favour of the writ petitioner. 3. Admittedly, the application for grant of lease was made prior to the amendment to the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994. Therefore, the end...
High Court Of Karnataka
Prashanth D V vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Raghvendra S Chauhan
27 July, 2017·2. The Commissioner Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, 2nd Floor, 3rd Block, M. S. Buildings, Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi, Bangalore-560001. 3. The Chief Executive Officer Zilla Panchayat, Shivamogga-577201, Shivamogga District. 4. The Proprietor B.K.R. Swamy Security Agencies, No.310, Pavil...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Pavan vs Smt Renukamani
Judges: B Veerappa
27 July, 2017·... RESPONDENT **** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER AT ANNEXURE-E DATED 3.7.2017 PASSED ON I.A.4 IN O.S.137/2015 BY THE LEARNED II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT CHIKKMAGALUR TO THE EXTENT THAT RECALL OF PW1 FOR CROS...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Geetha D/O Late Sri Puttaiah vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Raghvendra S Chauhan
27 July, 2017·THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Mr. K. S. Bheemaiah, the learned counsel for the respondents, submits that by order dated 10-07-2017, the petitioner was transferred and assigned to the Airport Sector. The order...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt M G Vanajakshi
Judges: B Veerappa
27 July, 2017·8. SMT. MYTHILI, 28 YEARS, D/O SUDHAKAR HEGDE, 9. KUM. PHANISHREE, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, D/O SUDHKAR HEGDE, 10. SMT. VRINDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, W/O SUDHKAR HEGDE, RESPONDENTS 8,9,10 ARE R/AT MUDUBA VILLAGE, SHRINGERI TALUK-577139 CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K. PRASAD HEGDE, ADVO...
High Court Of Karnataka
K S Srikantha Jois And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
27 July, 2017·1. K. S. SRIKANTHA JOIS, S/O LATE SEETHARAM JOIS, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O SHANKAR COLONY, SHANKAR MUTT ROAD, SHIMOGGA-577201. ... PETITIONER 2. C. N. CHANDRASHEKHARAPPA, S/O LATE B. M. NANJUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, BUKKAMBUDHI, TARIKERE TALLUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577145. ... RESPONDENTS ...
High Court Of Karnataka
V Lakshminarayana Setty vs Deputy Secretary To Government Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Raghvendra S Chauhan
27 July, 2017·This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the Court made the following : ORDER The petitioner has prayed before this Court that the respondent No.2, Federal Mogul T.P. India Ltd., should be directed to continue the petitioner in service till the petitioner reaches the age of 60 ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.