Canara Bank A Public Limited Company vs N G Subbaraya Setty And Others
Judges: S Sujatha, Jayant Patel
31 July, 2017·2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for future interest? If so, at what rate? 3. Whether the plaintiff proves that defendant No.1 has obtained Assignment Deed in its favour on 08.10.2003? 4. What order or decree? The above said issues are answered thus: Issue No.1:- In the affirmat...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Limited vs Smt Bhagyamma W/O Late Kempahanumaiah And Others
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao M
31 July, 2017·4. The appellant is common in both the appeals. In the two claim petitions, the learned Member passed the common judgment wherein, MVC Nos.3847/2012 and 4940/2012 came to be allowed in part and an amount of `7,75,112/- and `2,08,000/- with interest at 6% per annum was awarded as compensation ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others vs M/S Century Link Technology India Pvt Ltd
Judges: K S Mudagal Income, H G Ramesh
31 July, 2017·M/S.CENTURY LINK TECHNOLOGY INDIA PVT. LTD., SALARPURIA HALLMARK, BLOCK II I & II FLOORS, 002 B-WING, SURVEY NO.15/3 & 16, KADUBEESANAHALLI, VARTHUR ROAD BENGALURU-560 096 ...RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE SUBSTANTI...
High Court Of Karnataka
Pr Commissioner Of Income And Others vs M/S Kaseya Software India P Ltd
Judges: K S Mudagal Income, H G Ramesh
31 July, 2017·M/S.KASEYA SOFTWARE (INDIA) P.LTD NEIL ROAD TECH PARK PLOT NO.118, ROAD NO.3 EPIP PHASE-1 WHITE FIELD, BENGALURU-66 ...RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE TRIBUNAL ORDER DATED:2...
High Court Of Karnataka
T R Shivadas vs Smt P Geetha D/O Puthukudi Nanu
Judges: S Sujatha M, Jayant Patel
31 July, 2017·2. The appellant – husband had filed a petition under Section 13 (1) (i) (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. The couple were married on 23.05.2002 and were blessed with two children. The husband-appellant was doing contract wor...
High Court Of Karnataka
S Kumar vs Nandini J Y
Judges: S Sujatha, Jayant Patel
31 July, 2017·S.KUMAR S/O LATE SRI SUBRAMANYAM AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, #976, MIG-1, IV PHASE, KALYANAGIRI, MYSURU-570011. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI V.MANJUNATH PRASAD, ADV. FOR SRI V.M.PRASAD, ADV.) AND : NANDINI J.Y., W/O S. KUMAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, #976, MIG-1, IV PHASE, KALYANAGIRI, MYSURU-570011. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others vs M/S At & T Global Business Services India Pvt Ltd
Judges: K S Mudagal Income, H G Ramesh
31 July, 2017·M/S. AT & T GLOBAL BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD. BLOCK A, GROUND FLOOR SALARPURIA, SOFTZONE BELLANDUR POST BENGALURU ...RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE...
High Court Of Karnataka
Pr Commissioner Of Income And Others vs M/S Safran Engineering Services India Pvt Ltd Csrie
Judges: K S Mudagal Income, H G Ramesh
31 July, 2017·M/S. SAFRAN ENGINEERING SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD CSRIE, NO.32, GRAPE GARDEN 17TH ‘H’ MAIN ROAD, VI-BLOCK KORAMANGALA,BANGALORE-560 095 ...RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Cothas Coffee Co vs M/S Cotha Associates
Judges: Raghvendra S Chauhan
31 July, 2017·7. However, subsequently, the appellant was shocked to know that on 02.07.2014, the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have applied for registration of Trade Mark “COTHA” (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned trade mark”) under Category 30. The respondent Nos. 2 and 3 further claimed in their app...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others vs M/S British Engines India Pvt Ltd
Judges: K S Mudagal Income, H G Ramesh
31 July, 2017·M/S.BRITISH ENGINES (INDIA) PVT.LTD., NO.6A, ATTIBELE INDUSTRIAL AREA BENGALURU-562 107 ...RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE TRIBUNAL ORDER DATED:22.01.2016 ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.